Importance of Residency Applicant Factors Based on Specialty and Demographics: A National Survey of Program Directors

Author:

Strausser Sarah A.1,Dopke Kelly M.1,Groff Destin1,Boehmer Sue2,Olympia Robert P.3

Affiliation:

1. Penn State College of Medicine

2. Department of Public Health Services, Division of Biostatistics, Penn State Hershey Medical Center

3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Abstract

Abstract Background: With the transition away from traditional numerical grades/scores, residency applicant factors such as service, research, leadership, and extra-curricular activities may become more critical in the application process. Objective: To assess the importance of residency application factors reported by program directors (PDs), stratified by director demographics and specialty. Method: A questionnaire was electronically distributed to 4241 residency PDs in 23 specialties during spring 2022 and included questions on PD demographics and 22 residency applicant factors, including demographics, academic history, research involvement, and extracurricular activities. Responses were measured using a Likert scale for importance. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square and Fisher exact test analysis were performed. Results: 767 questionnaires were completed (19% response rate). Across all specialties, the factor considered most important was the interview (99.5%). When stratified by specialty, surgical PDs were more likely to characterize class rank, letters of recommendation, research, presenting scholarly work, and involvement in collegiate sports as extremely important/very important (all p< 0.0001). In contrast, primary care PDs favored the proximity of the candidate’s hometown (p= 0.0002) and community service (p= 0.03). Mean importance of applicant factors also differed by PD age, gender, and ethnicity. Conclusion: We have identified several residency application factors considered important by PDs, stratified by their specialty, demographics, and previous experiences. With the transition away from numerical grades/scores, medical students should be aware of the factors PDs consider important based on their chosen specialty. Our analysis may assist medical students in understanding the application and match process across various specialties.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference16 articles.

1. Examination USMLE. USMLE Step 1 Transition to Pass/Fail Only Score Reporting. 2021.

2. National Resident Matching Program DRaRC. Results of the 2022 NRMP Program Director Survey. Washington, DC.2022.

3. Colleges AAoM. Curriculum Reports - Grading Systems Used in Medical School Programs. 2022.

4. Residency Program Directors' Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey;Wolfson RK;Acad Med,2023

5. Results of a National Survey of Program Directors' Perspectives on a Pass/Fail US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1;Patel OU;JAMA Netw Open Jun,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3