Acute care pathway assessed through performance indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in OECD countries (2020-2021): a scoping review

Author:

Carvalho Ana Sofia V1,Broekema Bente1,Fernandes Óscar Brito1,Klazinga Niek1,Kringos Dionne1

Affiliation:

1. Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam

Abstract

Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted health systems, leading to care disruptions for non-COVID patients. Performance indicators to continuously monitor acute care, timely reported and internationally accepted, lacked during the COVID-19 pandemic in OECD countries. Methods: Scoping review. Search in Embase and MEDLINE databases. Acute care performance indicators were collected and collated following the care pathway; indicators related to acute general surgery were analyzed separately. Results: A total of 152 studies were included. 2354 indicators regarding general acute care and 301 indicators related to acute general surgery were collected and collated. Indicators focusing on pre-hospital services reported a decreasing trend in the volume of patients: from 225 indicators, 110 (49%) reported a decrease. An increasing trend in pre-hospital treatment times was reported by most of the indicators (n=41;70%) and a decreasing trend in survival rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n=61;75%). Concerning care provided in the emergency department, most of the indicators (n=752;71%) showed a decreasing trend in admissions, across all levels of urgency (n=26, 51% of highly urgent/level 1 indicators; n=20, 56% of level 2; n=31, 67% of level 3 and 4; and n=43, 78% of non-urgent/level 5 indicators). Indicators assessing the volume of diagnostic and treatment procedures signaled reductions: 65% (n=85) of the indicators and 51% (n=54) of the indicators, respectively. Concerning the mortality rate after admission, most of the indicators (n=23;53%) reported an increasing trend. The subset of indicators assessing acute general surgery showed a decreasing trend in the volume of patients reported by most of the indicators (n=50,49%), stability in clinical severity at admission (n=36,53%), and stability in the volume of surgeries (n=14,47%). Most of the indicators (n=28,65%) reported no change in treatment approach and stable mortality rate (n=11,69%). Conclusions: This review summarizes the performance indicators available in the literature to assess the quality of acute care in OECD countries and their trends during the first year and a half of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-July2021). These results highlight the relevance of assessing the acute care pathway more regularly and systematically across different clinical entities, to monitor care disruptions and improve the resilience of emergency services to crises.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference211 articles.

1. World Health Organization. A year without precedent: WHO’s COVID-19 response [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Feb 2]. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/year-without-precedent-who-s-covid-19-response

2. World Health Organization. : Geneva. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on noncommunicable disease resources and services: results of a rapid assessment. 2020.

3. Committee for the Coordination of Statistical activities. How COVID-19 is changing the world: a statistical perspective, Volume III [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Feb 2]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/resources/how-covid-19-is-changing-the-world-a-statistical-perspective-volume-iii/

4. World Health Organization. Rapid assessment of service delivery for NCDs during the COVID-19 pandemic [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Feb 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/rapid-assessment-of-service-delivery-for-ncds-during-the-covid-19-pandemic

5. OECD. Flattening the COVID-19 peak: Containment and mitigation policies [Internet]. Tackling coronavirus (COVID-19)- Policy responses. 2020 [cited 2023 Feb 2]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/flattening-the-covid-19-peak-containment-and-mitigation-policies-e96a4226/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3