A Public Benchmark for Human Performance in FCD Detection
Author:
Walger Lennart1, Schmitz Matthias H.1, Bauer Tobias1, Kügler David2, Schuch Fabiane1, Arendt Christophe3, Baumgartner Tobias1, Birkenheier Johannes1, Borger Valeri1, Endler Christoph1, Grau Franziska1, Immanuel Christian1, Kölle Markus1, Kupczyk Patrick1, Lakghomi Asadeh1, Mackert Sarah1, Neuhaus Elisabeth3, Nordsiek Julia1, Odenthal Anna-Maria1, Dague Karmele Olaciregui1, Ostermann Laura1, Pukropski Jan1, Racz Attila1, Ropp Klaus von der1, Schmeel Frederic Carsten1, Schrader Felix1, Sitter Aileen1, Unruh-Pinheiro Alexander1, Voigt Marilia1, Vychopen Martin1, von Wedel Philip4, von Wrede Randi1, Attenberger Ulrike1, Vatter Hartmut1, Philipsen Alexandra1, Becker Albert1, Reuter Martin2, Hattingen Elke3, Specht-Riemenschneider Louisa5, Radbruch Alexander1, Surges Rainer1, Rüber Theodor1
Affiliation:
1. University Hospital Bonn 2. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases 3. University Hospital Frankfurt 4. WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management 5. University of Bonn
Abstract
Abstract
This study aims to report human performance in the detection of Focal Cortical Dysplasias (FCDs), localized regions of malformed cerebral cortex, using a public dataset. Additionally, it defines a subset of this data as a representative testset to establish a baseline benchmark for the evaluation of automatic FCD detection approaches. The performance of 28 human readers was analyzed using 85 publicly available cases. Performance was measured based on the overlap between predicted regions of interest (ROIs) and ground truth lesion masks. The testset was chosen to consist of 15 subjects most predictive for human performance and 13 subjects identified by at most 3 readers. Expert readers achieved an average detection rate of 68%, compared to 45% for non-experts and 27% for laypersons. Neuroradiologists detected the highest percentage of lesions (64%), while psychiatrists detected the least (34%). Neurosurgeons had the highest ROI sensitivity (0.70), and psychiatrists had the highest ROI precision (0.78). In the testset, expert detection rate was 49%. Reporting human performance in FCD detection provides a baseline for assessing the effectiveness of automatic detection methods in a clinically relevant context. The representative testset will serve as an indicator for the clinical usefulness of computer-aided FCD detection approaches.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference11 articles.
1. “Histopathological Findings in Brain Tissue Obtained during Epilepsy Surgery;Blumcke Ingmar;New England Journal of Medicine,2017 2. Seizure Outcome and Use of Antiepileptic Drugs after Epilepsy Surgery According to Histopathological Diagnosis: A Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Study;Lamberink Herm J;The Lancet Neurology,2020 3. Naeini, Mahdi Pakdaman, Gregory Cooper, and Milos Hauskrecht. 2015. “Obtaining Well Calibrated Probabilities Using Bayesian Binning.” In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 29. 4. “An Open Presurgery MRI Dataset of People with Epilepsy and Focal Cortical Dysplasia Type II;Schuch Fabiane;Scientific Data,2023 5. Sherif, Tarek, Nicolas Kassis, Marc-Étienne Rousseau, Reza Adalat, and Alan C. Evans. 2015. “BrainBrowser: Distributed, Web-Based Neurological Data Visualization.” Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 8. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2014.00089.
|
|