Barriers and facilitators to implementing workplace interventions to promote mental health: qualitative evidence synthesis

Author:

Paterson Charlotte1,Leduc Caleb2,Maxwell Margaret1ORCID,Aust Birgit3,Strachan Heather1ORCID,O'Connor Ainslie4,Tsantila Fotini5,Cresswell-Smith Johanna6,Purebl Gyorgy7,Winter Lars8,Fanaj Naim9,Doukani Asmae10,Hogg Bridget11,Corcoran Paul12,D'Alessandro Luigia13,Mathieu Sharna14,Hegerl Ulrich15,Arensman Ella2,Greiner Birgit2

Affiliation:

1. University of Stirling

2. University College Cork School of Public Health

3. National Research Centre for the Working Environment: Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Arbejdsmiljo

4. Pintail Limited

5. LUCAS Centre for Care Research and Consultancy

6. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos

7. Semmelweis University: Semmelweis Egyetem

8. Phrenos Centre of Expertise for Severe Mental Illness

9. Almae Mater Europaea Campus College Rezonanca

10. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

11. Hospital del Mar

12. University College Cork Department of Epidemiology and Public Health: University College Cork School of Public Health

13. International Association for Suicide Prevention

14. Griffith University

15. Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt am Main

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Despite growing interest in workplace mental health interventions, evidence of their effectiveness is mixed. Implementation science offers a valuable lens to investigate the factors influencing successful implementation. However, evidence synthesis is lacking, especially for small-to-medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and for specific work sectors. The objectives of this review are to establish the scope of research with explicit analysis of implementation aspects of workplace mental health interventions and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation in general and within SMEs and selected sectors. Methods: A systematic scoping review and meta-synthesis of mixed methods process evaluation research from 11 databases, with evaluation of methodological quality (MMAT) and confidence in findings (CERQual), was conducted. We selected information-rich studies and synthesised using domains within the Nielsen and Randall implementation framework: context, intervention activities, implementation; and mental models. Results: We included 43 studies published between 2009 and 2022, of which 22 were rated as information-rich to be analysed for barriers and facilitators. Most studies were conducted in healthcare. Facilitators reflecting ‘high confidence’ included: relevant and tailored content, continuous and pro-active leadership buy-in and support, internal or external change agents/champions, assistance from managers and peers, resources, and senior level experience and awareness with mental health issues. Healthcare sector specific facilitators included: easy accessibility with time provided, fostering relationships, clear communication, and perceptions of intervention. Stigma and confidentiality issues were reported as barriers overall. Due to the small number of studies within SMEs reported findings did not reach ‘high confidence’. A lack of studies in construction and Information and Communication Technology meant separate analyses were not possible. Conclusions: There is dependable evidence of key factors for implementation of workplace mental health interventions which should be used to improve implementation. However, there is a lack of studies in SMEs and in a larger variety of sectors. Registration: Research Registry (reviewregistry897)

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference139 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Mental Health at Work [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-at-work.

2. Gallup. State of the Global Workplace [Internet]. Gallup. ; 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace-2022- report.aspx.

3. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic;Santomauro DF;The Lancet,2021

4. Early labor force exits in patients with treatment-resistant depression: an assessment of work years lost in a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study;Bang Madsen K;Ther Adv Psychopharmacol,2020

5. Unemployment, depressiveness and disability retirement: a follow-up study of the Finnish HeSSup population sample;Lamberg T;Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3