Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Detection of Root Perforations Using Different Voxel Sizes in Comparison to Digital Periapical Radiograph, An in vitro study

Author:

Abada Hisham1,gemaie Dana El2,Shreif Mohamed El3,Hatata Nour1

Affiliation:

1. Kafrelsheikh University

2. Galala University

3. Menoufia University

Abstract

AbstractObjectives:The aim of this study is to quantitatively compare the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT with 0.2 and 0.4 mm3voxel sizes and a digital PR for the detection of strip perforation for mesial root of the mandibular first molar with and without root canal obturation when evaluated by different observer specialty.Materials and Methods:48 intact mandibular first molars were selected for this study, the teeth were divided to the following groups: (i)no strip perforation and no obturation, (ii) no strip perforation and obturation, (iii) strip perforation and no obturation, (iv) strip perforation and obturation. Each tooth was inserted in a dry mandible to obtain intraoral digital, CBCT images were obtained using two voxel sizes 0.2 and 0.4 mm3. Two general practitioners, two endodontists, and two dentomaxillofacial radiologists were asked to evaluate all images for detection of strip root perforation individually and together. The sensitivity and specificity of all images modalities to diagnose perforations were calculated.Results:There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of the PR images observed by the two general practitioners and two radiologists, while they showed a statistically low significant difference compared to the images observed by the two endodontists. CBCT images accuracy showed a higher significant difference than PR images observed by general practitioners and radiologists.Conclusions: CBCT was associated with significantly greater accuracy for detection of strip root perforation than PR. When two endodontist specialists observed the PR together, they showed a higher significance difference in the detection of root perforation compared to general practitioners and radiologists, and they showed no significant difference compared CBCT images. There was no significant difference between 0.2 and 0.4 mm3voxel sizes of CBCT images.Clinical Relevance: The accuracy of PR in the detection of root perforation is equal to that of CBCT when observed by two endodontists, and it is higher than the accuracy of PR images observed by general practitioners and radiologists.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3