Wildfires In Australia: A Bibliometric Analysis and A Glimpse On  ‘Black Summer’ (2019/20) Disaster

Author:

Haque K M Shamsul1ORCID,Uddin Minhaz2,Ampah Jeffrey3,Haque Kamrul4,Hossen Shahadat5,Rokonuzzaman Md6,Hossain Yeamin7,Hossain Sazzad8,Rahman Zillur9

Affiliation:

1. Charles Sturt University - Wagga Wagga Campus

2. The Education University of Hong Kong

3. Tianjin University of Science and Technology

4. institute of Bangabandhu

5. Bangladesh Agricultural University

6. Sylhet Agricultural University

7. University of Rajshahi

8. Kiel University of Applied Sciences: Fachhochschule Kiel

9. The University of Sydney

Abstract

Abstract A wildfire, an unplanned fire that is largely uncontrolled and originates in combustible vegetation in rural or urban settings, is one of the most pervasive natural catastrophes in some areas, such as Siberia, California, and Australia. Many studies, such as standard reviews, have been undertaken to look into the works of literature on wildfires or forest fires and their effects on aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Regrettably, conventional literature reviews failed to identify the important researchers, evolving complexities, emerging research hotspots, trends, and opportunities for further research on the ground of wildfire study. The present study employs bibliometric analysis to investigate this study area qualitatively and quantitatively. The Scopus database systems and Web of Science Core Collection yielded 78 qualifying papers, which were then evaluated using Biblioshiny (A bibliometrix tool of R-studio). According to the statistics, the discipline is expanding at a pace that is 13.68 percent faster than average. So far, three key periods of transformation have been documented: preliminary evolution (8 articles; 1999–2005), gentle evolution (14 articles; 2006–2013), and quick evolution (56 articles; 2014 to 2021). FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT and SCIENCE journals have the highest number of publications, accounting for 7.70% of total wildfire-related articles published from 1999 to 2021. However, recent data indicate that investigators are shifting their focus to wildfires, with the term AUSTRALIA having the highest frequency (91) and WILDFIRE having the second highest (58) as the most appeared keywords. The present study will provide a foundation for future research on wildfire incidence and management by receiving information by synthesising previously published literature in Australia and around the world.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference89 articles.

1. Soil condition after bushfires | Australian Academy of Science;AAS,2020

2. ABARES (2020) Farm production value holds despite bushfires, drought. Aust. Bur. Agric. Resour. Econ. Sci. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/news/media-releases/2020/farm-production-value-holds-despite-bushfires-drought

3. ACS (2020) Annual Climate Statement. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate

4. A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases;Aghaei Chadegani A;Asian Social Science,2013

5. Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis;Aguillo IF;Scientometrics,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3