Floristic classification is not a predictor of species-specific evolutionary patterns

Author:

Fahey Patrick1ORCID,Dimon Richard2,Merwe Marlien van der3ORCID,Bragg Jason3,Rossetto Maurizio3

Affiliation:

1. The University of Queensland

2. Research Centre for Ecosystem Resilience, Botanic Gardens of Sydney

3. Research Centre for Ecosystem Resilience, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust

Abstract

Abstract The relationship between intra-specific and inter-specific patterns and processes over evolutionary time is key to ecological investigations. We examine this relationship from a novel perspective, focussing on the association between floristic classifications, a summary of inter-specific processes, and intra-specific genetic structuring. Applying an innovative, multispecies, and standardised population genomic approach we test the relationship between vegetation mapping schemes and landscape-level estimates of gene flow across a large, environmentally heterogenous region. We show that intra-specific genetic variation shows limited correspondence to vegetation classifications and is better explained by distance between sampled populations and the location of biogeographical features which limit gene flow. However, vegetation classification schemes with contiguous mapping classes were more predictive of genetic lineages than geographically non-contiguous schemes. The size of mapping units was found to be important, as most local vegetation types contained only single intra-specific genetic lineages, while these genetic lineages spanned hundreds of km’s across multiple vegetation types. We conclude that floristic classifications are not closely correlated with intra-specific genetic patterns, showing that intra-specific genetic processes are independent of inter-specific floristic assembly processes. This study also showcases the depth of understanding that can be developed using large, multispecies genetic datasets.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3