Affiliation:
1. Nanyang Institute of Technology
2. Shandong Tangkou Coal Industry Co., Ltd
3. Shandong Vocational College of Light Industry
4. Binzhou Polytechnic
Abstract
Abstract
Based on a coal burst in LW 1305 and combined with the curve of stress vs. strain, six multi-parameters are proposed to forewarn coal burst induced by static high-stress concentration and impact loading, containing microseismic (MS) activity S value, fault total area A(t) value, lacking of shock b value, statistical Z value, MS entropy value and the dominant frequency. The precursors mainly characterize the enhancement trend of S value, the suddenly and sharply rise of A(t) value, the continuous and abnormal lower b value, the increasing absolute value of Z sharply and large than 2, the continuous and abnormal decline of Qt value, and the dominant frequency moving to low-frequency band, respectively. The coal burst in LW 1305 was induced by the intrinsic static high-stress concentration and the external strong impact loading generated by fracturing of the key stratum. Essentially, a lot of micro-fissures inside the key stratum had initiated, converged and connected to form the macro-fracture above LW 1305, which was verified by the attenuation rate of K value. Considering the time-varying effect of the overlying stratum movement, the curves of the six multi-parameters have a good agreement with that of stress vs. strain, which indicates it is reasonable to take the observed zone as a whole system to investigate variation of the multi-parameters and fracturing of the key stratum. It is noteworthy that the MS multi-parameters should be combined with reasonable mining arrangement and corresponding prevention measures to monitor, forecast and control coal bursts in the field.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Cai W, Dou LM, Si GY, Cao AY, Gong SY, Wang GF, Yuan SS. A new seismic-based strain energy methodology for coal burst forecasting in underground coal mines [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2019, 123:104086.
2. Rockburst mechanism in coal rock with structural surface and the microseismic (MS) and electromagnetic radiation (EMR) response [J];Li XL;Engineering Failure Analysis,2021
3. Risk evaluation of rock burst through theory of static and dynamic stresses superposition [J];Li ZL;Journal of Central South University,2015
4. Xue RX, Liang ZZ, Xu NW. Rockburst prediction and analysis of activity characteristics within surrounding rock based on microseismic monitoring and numerical simulation [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2021, 142:104750.
5. Rockburst characteristics and microseismic monitoring of deep-buried tunnels for Jinping II Hydropower Station [J];Ma TH;Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2015