Concomitant training in robotic and laparoscopic liver resections of low-to-intermediate difficulty score: a retrospective analysis of the learning curve

Author:

Bernardi Lorenzo1,Balzano Emanuele2,Roesel Raffaello1,Ghinolfi Davide2,Vagelli Filippo2,Menconi Giacomo2,Petrusic Antonietta1,Mongelli Francesco1,Majno-Hurst Pietro1,De Simone Paolo2,Cristaudi Alessandra1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano

2. Hepato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), University of Pisa

Abstract

Abstract In the setting of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS), training in robotic liver resections (RLR) usually follows previous experience in laparoscopic liver resections (LLR). The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve (LC) of RLR in case of concomitant training with LLR. We analyzed consecutive RLRs and LLRs by a surgeon trained simultaneously in both techniques (Surg1); while a second surgeon trained only in LLRs was used as control (Surg2). A regression model was used to adjust for confounders and a Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis was carried out to assess the learning phases according to operative time and difficulty of the procedures (IWATE score). Two-hundred-forty-five procedures were identified (RobSurg1, n = 75, LapSurg1, n = 102, LapSurg2, n = 68). Mean IWATE was 4.0, 4.3 and 5.8 (p < 0.001) in each group. The CUSUM analysis of the adjusted operative times estimated the learning phase in 40 cases (RobSurg1), 40 cases (LapSurg1), 48 cases (LapSurg2); for IWATE score it was 38 cases (RobSurg1), 33 cases (LapSurg1), 38 cases (LapSurg2) respectively. Our preliminary experience showed a similar LC of 40 cases for low and intermediate difficulty RLR and LLR. Concomitant training in both techniques was safe and may be a practical option for starting a MILS program.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference27 articles.

1. Robotics in General Surgery: Personal Experience in a Large Community Hospital;Giulianotti PC;Arch Surg,2003

2. Robotic liver surgery: Results for 70 resections;Giulianotti PC;Surgery,2011

3. The impact of robotics in liver surgery: A worldwide systematic review and short-term outcomes meta‐analysis on 2,728 cases;Ciria R;J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci,2022

4. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database;Miller HP;Am Surg,2021

5. Pan-European survey on the implementation of robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive liver surgery;Zwart MJW;HPB,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3