The Physical Therapy Efficacy Index and Chart: a stimulus for value-based healthcare using real-world data. A mixed methods study

Author:

Kiers Henri1,Felius Richard A.W.1,Heijmans Martijn W.2,Verburg Arie C.1

Affiliation:

1. Association for Quality in Physical Therapy

2. Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc

Abstract

Abstract

Background Health care costs are rising rapidly in Western societies. Understanding the benefits and costs of care is crucial to maintaining or improving existing health care systems. We propose an instrument that provides a clear overview of both the costs and returns of a treatment to improve the quality of care while keeping the costs affordable. Methods First, a general value-based healthcare concept was developed as an efficacy index. Second, a Physiotherapy-specific Efficacy Index (PE-Index) for musculoskeletal disorders was formulated based on pain and functional improvement, treatments, and episode duration. The PE-Index 's discriminative value was assessed using a linear mixed model with physiotherapy practices as a random effect in real-world data from a national registry. Variation attributed to practices was quantified by an intraclass correlation coefficient. Separate linear mixed models and a radar plot (PE-Graph) visualized individual PE-Index components. Lastly, stakeholders evaluated the PE-Index and PE-Graph for internal quality improvement and external transparency through surveys and advisory board meetings. Results In total, 95.805 episodes treated in 370 practices were included in the linear mixed models. The PE-Index demonstrated an adequate discriminative ability with an ICC of 0.118. Stakeholders agree that the PE-Index and the PE-Chart are appropriate for improvement of quality of care and enhancing the current system for external transparency. Nevertheless, because of concerns about a too hasty implementation and the risk of strategic gaming, both were not considered suitable for external transparency right now. Conclusions The PE-Index and PE-Graph are adequate instruments to discriminate between practices and can be used for internal quality improvement, however, are not yet suitable for external transparency purposes.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference20 articles.

1. CBS Statistics Netherlands. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 27]. Zorguitgaven; kerncijfers. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/cijfers/detail/84047NED?dl=926E6.

2. Cost-effectiveness of physiotherapeutic interventions for low back pain: a systematic review;Fatoye F;Physiotherapy,2020

3. Porter ME, Teisberg EO. Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-based Competition on Results. Harvard Business Review; 2006.

4. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019;Cieza A;Lancet Lond Engl,2021

5. A four-category verbal rating scale (VRS-4), an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11), and a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) were compared in the assessment of acute pain after oral surgery;Hartrick CT;Clin J Pain,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3