Attitudes, Beliefs, and Recommendations for Persistent Low Back Pain Patients: Cross-Sectional Surveys of Students and Faculty at a Chiropractic College

Author:

Muller Ryan1ORCID,Cooper Jesse,Gliedt Jordan A.,Pohlman Katherine A.ORCID

Affiliation:

1. VA Connecticut Health System West Haven Campus: VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven VA Medical Center

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthcare providers’ attitudes and beliefs about pain conditions influence those of patients and may impact outcomes. While the use of chiropractic care for persistent low back pain (PLBP) is prevalent, chiropractors’ attitudes and beliefs related to PLBP patients are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes and beliefs and activity/work recommendations of students and faculty at a chiropractic teaching institution regarding PLBP patients.Methods The Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) and clinical vignettes were requested to be completed by all chiropractic students and faculty at Parker University in April 2018 and July-December 2020. HC-PAIRS scores range from 1–7, with higher scores indicating stronger beliefs that PLBP justifies disability and limitation of activities. Activity and work recommendations from clinical vignettes were rated as “adequate”, “neutral”, or “inadequate”. Descriptive statistics and independent t-tests were used to analyze results.Results Student and faculty response rates in 2018 and 2020 were 63.6% (n = 497) and 25.9% (n = 305), and 76.7% (n = 23) and 41.5% (n = 22), respectively. Faculty mean HC-PAIRS scores (SD) (2018: 3.66 (0.88); 2020: 3.49 (0.91)) were significantly lower than students’ (2018: 4.41 (0.71); 2020: 4.22 (0.69)) in both years (p < 0.05). The decrease in student mean scores between years was statistically significant (mean change: 0.19, p < 0.05), while the decrease in faculty mean scores was insignificant (mean change: 0.17, p = 0.55). In 2018 and 2020, the percentage of faculty that provided “adequate” activity (2018: 62.1; 2020: 66.7) and work (2018: 41.0; 2020: 45.5) recommendations was significantly greater than students’ activity (2018: 33.9; 2020: 30.3) and work (2018: 21.2; 2020: 23.8) recommendations. Within-group changes in percentage of “adequate” recommendations given by students and faculty between years were not significant.Conclusions As the first study to consecutively assess the PLBP attitudes and beliefs of students and faculty of a chiropractic college, we found that there is room for improvement in these areas. Changes in attitudes and activity/work recommendations between the 2 years were minimal and found faculty scores to be more appropriate than those of students. Strategies to improve scores should be considered at chiropractic training institutions.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference33 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3