Effects of microbes in pig farms on occupational exposed persons and the environment
Author:
Han Jinyi1ORCID, Li Mengyu1, Li Xin1, Liu Chuang1, Li Xiu-Ling1, Wang Kejun1, Qiao Ruimin1, Yang Feng1, Han Xuelei1, Li Xin-Jian1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Henan Agricultural University
Abstract
Abstract
Pig farming has an effect on farmers and the farm environment. Pig gut microbes play an important role in this effect. However, which microbial composition is more likely to be affected remains unknown. Primarily, we collected 136 samples in pig farm A, including 70 pig fecal, 18 farmers, 4 individuals without contact with any type of farm animal (“non-exposed” persons) fecal, and 44 environmental dust samples (dust from inside and outside pig houses and the farm). Another 43 samples were collected from pig farm B, including 10 pig fecal, 24 environment samples, and 9 humans fecal. Whereafter, 16S rRNA sequencing and taxonomic composition analysis were performed. Result showed that pig farmers significantly upregulated 13 genera compared with non-exposed persons, and 76 genera were significantly upregulated inside the pig house than outside the pig house. Comparing non-exposed persons who were farther away from the pig farm, the results showed that the relative abundance of three microbes, including Turicibacter, Terrisporobacter, and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, increased between the farmers and environment inside and outside the pig farm, and significant differences were observed (P < 0.05). Moreover, the abundance increased with the exposure time of farmer animals and spatial location to pigs. The greater the distance from the farm, the less effective the three microbes were. Although the distance is about 550 km, the analysis results of pig farm A and pig farm B confirm each other. This study shows that the three microbes where pig farmers co-occurring with the environment come from pig farms, which provides new ideas for blocking the transmission of microbial aerosols in pig farms and reducing pollution.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Bolyen E, Rideout J, Dillon M, Bokulich N, Abnet C, Al-Ghalith G, Alexander H, Alm E, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz J, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn C, Brown C, Callahan B, Caraballo-Rodríguez A, Chase J, Cope E, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein P, Douglas G, Durall D, Duvallet C, Edwardson C, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz J, Gibbons S, Gibson D, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley G, Janssen S, Jarmusch A, Jiang L, Kaehler B, Kang K, Keefe C, Keim P, Kelley S, Knights D, Koester I, Kosciolek T, Kreps J, Langille M, Lee J, Ley R, Liu Y, Loftfield E, Lozupone C, Maher M, Marotz C, Martin B, McDonald D, McIver L, Melnik A, Metcalf J, Morgan S, Morton J, Naimey A, Navas-Molina J, Nothias L, Orchanian S, Pearson T, Peoples S, Petras D, Preuss M, Pruesse E, Rasmussen L, Rivers A, Robeson M, Rosenthal P, Segata N, Shaffer M, Shiffer A, Sinha R, Song S, Spear J, Swafford A, Thompson L, Torres P, Trinh P, Tripathi A, Turnbaugh P, Ul-Hasan S, van der Hooft J, Vargas F, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Vogtmann E, von Hippel M, Walters W, Wan Y, Wang M, Warren J, Weber K, Williamson C, Willis A, Xu Z, Zaneveld J, Zhang Y, Zhu Q., Knight, R., Caporaso, J., 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37, 852–857. doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 2. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data;Callahan B;Nat Methods,2016 3. Triple-hurdle model analysis of the factors influencing biogas digester building, use and processing by Chinese pig farmers;Chen Y;Sci Total Environ,2021 4. Effects of Xylo-Oligosaccharides on Growth and Gut Microbiota as Potential Replacements for Antibiotic in Weaning Piglets;Chen Y;Front Microbiol,2021 5. A synthetic probiotic engineered for colorectal cancer therapy modulates gut microbiota;Chung Y;Microbiome,2021
|
|