Affiliation:
1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2. Kerman University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
Abstract
Background
End stage renal disease (ESRD) is a major health concern and a large drain on healthcare resources. A wide range of payment methods are used for management of ESRD. The main aim of this study is to identify current payment methods for dialysis and their effects.
Method
In this scoping review Pubmed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from 2000 until 2021 using appropriate search strategies. Retrieved articles were screened according to predefined inclusion criteria. Data about the study characteristics and study results were extracted by a pre-structured data extraction form; and were analyzed by a thematic analysis approach.
Results
59 articles were included, the majority of them were published after 2011 (66%); all of them were from high and upper middle-income countries, especially USA (64% of papers). Fee for services, global budget, capitation (bundled) payments, and pay for performance (P4P) were the main reimbursement methods for dialysis centers; and FFS, salary, and capitation were the main methods to reimburse the nephrologists. Countries have usually used a combination of methods depending on their situations; and their methods have been further developed over time specially from the retrospective payment systems (RPS) towards the prospective payment systems (PPS) and pay for performance methods. The main effects of the RPS were undertreatment of unpaid and inexpensive services, and over treatment of payable services. The main effects of the PPS were cost saving, shifting the service cost outside the bundle, change in quality of care, risk of provider, and modality choice.
Conclusion
This study provides useful insights about the current payment systems for dialysis and the effects of each payment system; that might be helpful for improving the quality and efficiency of healthcare.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference85 articles.
1. An international analysis of dialysis services reimbursement;Tol A;Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology,2019
2. Wong G, Howard K, Chapman JR, Chadban S, Cross N, Tong A, Webster AC, Craig JC: Comparative survival and economic benefits of deceased donor kidney transplantation and dialysis in people with varying ages and co-morbidities. PloS one 2012, 7(1):e29591.
3. Reducing the costs of chronic kidney disease while delivering quality health care: a call to action;Vanholder R;Nature Reviews Nephrology,2017
4. The importance of home and community-based settings in population health management;Cohen N;Phillips Home Monitoring
5. Iranian model of paid and regulated living-unrelated kidney donation;Ghods AJ;Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology,2006