Post-Discharge Rebleeding in Splenic Injury: A Predictive Model

Author:

Chen Jian-Han1,Hsieh Pie-Wen1,Chen Chung-Yen1,Yu Po-Chin1,Huang Yi-Kai1,Lin Hung-Yu2

Affiliation:

1. E-da hospital

2. E-da Cancer hospital

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND:This study aimed to develop a predictive model for identifying patients with high rebleeding risk after discharge from treatment without splenectomy and embolization for splenic injury. METHODS: Data were extracted from the 1996–2013 National Health Insurance Research Database. Adult patients aged ≥18 years with splenic injury (ICD-9-CM codes 865.01–865.09) from 2000 to 2012 were included. Patients who died, underwent splenectomy (ICD-9-OP codes 41.5, 41.42,41.43, and 41.95) or transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) (ICD-9-OP codes 39.79 and 99.29) on the first admission were excluded. The primary endpoint was rebleeding, which was identified if patients underwent splenectomy or TAE at 180 days after discharge. The patients were randomly divided into derivation (80%) and validation (20%) groups for analyze. RESULTS: 6,140 were finally included. After conducting a multivariate analysis on the derivation group (n=4916), six risk factors were identified and assigned with different scores to generate the Delayed Splenic Bleeding System (DSBS) based on the coefficient of variables significantly related to rebleeding: age <54 years (1 point), male sex (1 point), length of hospitalization ≤6 days (1 point), non-traffic accident-induced injury (1 point), ISS ≥16 (1 point), and history of congestive heart failure (2 points). The rebleeding rates at 180 days after discharge was significantly higher with DSBS score >3 (3.4%) than with DSBS score ≤3 (0.8%) (p<0.001); similar results were observed in the validation group (1.0% for DSBS score ≤3 vs. 4.2% for DSBS score >3, p=0.002). The areas under the ROC curve were 0.701 (p<0.001) and 0.675 (p=0.009) for the derivation and validation groups, respectively. The DSBS showed good calibration in the derivation group (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2=2.607, p=0.272) and validation group (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2=3.009, p=0.222). CONCLUSIONS: Our prediction model (i.e., the DSBS) effectively predicted the 180-day rebleeding risk, which could enable stratification in further studies or pre-discharge treatment for blunt splenic injury.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3