Value of focused assessment with sonography for trauma in management of hypotensive polytrauma patients– A Meta-analysis

Author:

Awad Philobater1,Hassan Basma1

Affiliation:

1. Ain Shams University Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background Severe or major trauma is a worldwide pandemic and one of the leading causes of death and disability. Polytrauma always involves young, productive individuals and represents a substantial burden on the society Management of Trauma injuries generally emphasizes the importance of identifying and prioritizing the most serious life-threatening injuries and managing them. Management consists of a rapid primary survey, resuscitation of vital functions, a more detailed secondary survey, and, finally, the initiation of definitive care. Damage-control surgery has increasing role as it proves reliability in the most sensitive situations. Objective To assess the Value of focused assessment with sonography for management of hypotensive polytrauma patients. Patients and Methods: All trials about the usage include participants who came to ER due to polytrauma with blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma or with undifferentiated shock, randomized controlled trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies that assess the value of focused sonography in hypotensive polytrauma patients. Results The value of an odds ratio like that of other measures of test performance for example sensitivity and specificity and likelihood ratios depends on prevelance. For example, a test with pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 10.00 is considered to be very good by current standards, therefore pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 77.46 which is considered to be very good. Spearman correlation coefficient:-0.429 with p value 0.397 which is insignificant so, there was low threshold effect Positive and negative Likelihood ratio both are done on six studies with positive likelihood ratio is 21.27 and negative likelihood ratio is 0.29 sensitivity and specificity are done on the six studies with pooled sensitivity is 0.73 and pooled specificity is 0.98. Data Sources: Medline databases (PubMed, Medscape, ScienceDirect. EMF-Portal) and all materials available in the Internet till 2022. Conclusion FAST is significant in polytrauma patients especially in hypotensive patients with considerable accuracy rate 77.46 and good pooled sensitivity with 0.73 and pooled specificity with 0.98 and good ROC curve with are under the curve 0.70.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference23 articles.

1. Preventable or potentially preventable mortality at a mature trauma center;Teixeira PG;J Trauma,2007

2. Blunt abdominal trauma patients: can organ injury be excluded without performing computed tomography?;Poletti PA;J Trauma,2014

3. Pullinger R. Are diagnostic peritoneal lavage or focused abdominal sonography for trauma safe screening investigations for hemodynamically stable patients after blunt abdominal trauma? A review of the literature;Griffin XL;J Trauma.,2007

4. Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST): in 2017: What Radiologists Can Learn;Richards JR;Radiology,2017

5. Emergent abdominal sonography as a screening test in a new diagnostic algorithm for blunt trauma;Boulanger BR;J Trauma,1996

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3