A practical two-step procedure for taking into account all available information (prior and current) about influence quantities in measurement uncertainty analysis

Author:

Huang Hening1

Affiliation:

1. Teledyne Technologies (United States)

Abstract

AbstractThis paper considers the problem of computing the combined standard uncertainty of an indirect measurement, in which the measurand is related to multiple influence quantities through a measurement model. In practice, there may be prior information or current information, or both, about the influence quantities. We propose a practical two-step procedure for taking into account all available information (prior and current) about influence quantities in measurement uncertainty analysis. The first step is to combine prior and current information to form the merged information for each influence quantity based on the weighted average method or the law of combination of distributions. The second step deals with the propagation of the merged information to calculate the combined standard uncertainty using the law of propagation of uncertainty (LPU) or the principle of propagation of distributions. The proposed two-step procedure is based entirely on frequentist statistics. A case study on the calibration of a test weight (mass calibration) is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed two-step procedure and compare it with a subjective Bayesian approach.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference28 articles.

1. Cheney, W., Kincaid, D.: Numerical mathematics and computing. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Monterey, CA (1980)

2. D’Agostini, G.: Jeffreys priors versus experienced physicist priors: arguments against objective Bayesian theory. Proceedings of the 6th Valencia International Meeting on Bayesian Statistics (Alcossebre, Spain, May 30th -June 4th ), (1998)

3. Guidance on Bayesian uncertainty evaluation for a class of GUM measurement models;Demeyer S;Metrologia,2021

4. EA Laboratory Committee and others: Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration. European Co-Operation for Accreditation, Paris, France, Report No. EA-4/02 M: (2013)

5. Bayesian estimation with informative priors is indistinguishable from data falsification;García-Pérez MA;The Spanish Journal of Psychology,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3