Critical incidents during anesthesia: prospective cohort study

Author:

Bielka K.1,Kuchyn I.1,Frank M.1,Sirenko I.1,Yurovich A.2,Slipuha D.3,Lisnyy I.1,Soliaryk S.1,Posternak G.1

Affiliation:

1. Bogomolets National Medical University

2. Mukachevo Central District Hospital

3. Medical center “Medion”

Abstract

Abstract Background: a critical incident reporting and analysis is one of the key components of patient safety in anesthesiology. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and characteristics of critical incidents during anesthesia, main causes and factors involved, influence on patients outcomes, prevalence of emergency notification and response systems. Methods: A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted at the clinical departments of Bogomolets National Medical University (postgraduate department of surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care)during the period from 1 June 2021 to 1December2021. 13 hospitals from different Ukraine regions took part in the study. The study design was approved by the Bogomolets National Medical University (NMU)ethics committee, protocol #148, 07.09.2021. Results: The mean incidence of critical incidents during anesthesia in Ukraine was 0.94% (ranging from 0.04% to 3.4% on different sites). Most common incidents were related to the respiratory system: difficult airway (26.8%), reintubation (6.4%), oxygen desaturation (13.8%); cardiovascular system: hypotension (14.9%), tachycardia (6.4%), bradycardia(11.7%), hypertension (5.3%), collapse (3.2%); massive hemorrhage (17%). Surprisingly emergency situations often occurred while treating patients considered low-risk as assessed by an anesthesiologist (ASA II – 57.4%) and during planned surgical interventions (63.2%). Among common reasons that could lead to the incident, the treating physicians have identified: individual patient features (47%), surgical tactics (18%), anesthesia (16%) and human factor (12%). The most frequent shortcomings of the patient management were: preoperative assessment (44%), incorrect interpretation of the patients’ state (33%), faulty manipulation technique (14%), miscommunication (13%) and delay in emergency care provision (10%). Furthermore, 48% of cases, as judged by participating physicians, were preventable and the consequences of another 18% could be minimized. The consequences of the emergency situations were insignificant in over a half of the cases, but in 24.5% have led to protracted hospital stay with 30 patients (16%) being urgently transferred to the ICU and 12 (6.5%) dying in the hospital.34.8% of reported incidents were not documented otherwise and 16.3% were not reported to the chief of department. The emergency situation was followed by a detailed examination within the department in 58.1% of cases with 6.5% resulting in a permanent policy change. Conclusion: Critical incidents during anesthesia occur rather often and impact the treatment results significantly. Notification, registration and analysis of such incidents are not being performed systematically, which proves to be one of the major threats to patient safety during anesthesia. Study registration: NCT05435287, clinicaltrials.gov, 28/06/2022

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3