Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for stage 0-I gastric cancer: A multicenter, retrospective analysis

Author:

Feng Xingyu1,Ye Zaisheng2,Zhou Fangyao1,Zheng Chengbin1,Zhang Zhaojun1,Xiong Wenjun3,Zeng Yi2,Wang Junjiang1,Hu Weixian1,Zheng Jiabin1,Luo Bin1,Wang Wei3,Chen Luchuan2,Li Yong1

Affiliation:

1. Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University

2. Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital

3. Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, University of Chinese Medicine

Abstract

Abstract

Background The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer need to be further investigated. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinicopathological data of 122 patients with stage 0-I gastric cancer underwent radical laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) or open total gastrectomy (OTG) from January 2010 to December 2013. Multivariate regression with a generalized estimation equation (GEE) was used to analyze the differences in total complications, LTG-related complications and OTG-related complications between the laparoscopic and open groups. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to compare the long-term survival of the two groups. The primary outcome was the short-term outcomes and long-term survival of LTG with traditional OTG for stage 0-I gastric cancer. Results The incidence of postoperative complications was 16.4% in the LTG group and 18.4% in the OTG group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the adjusted multivariate GEE regression for OTG-related complications, the risk of OTG-related complications in the laparoscopic group was 0.111 (95% CI: 0.016–0.771, P = 0.026). Before and after IPTW adjustment, there was no statistically significant difference in survival between the LTG group and the OTG group (P = 0.28 and P = 0.34). Conclusions LTG is safe and feasible to apply in stage 0-I gastric cancer. Comparing OTG, LTG with a similar overall complication rate and long-term survival, but reduce the incidence of OTG-related complications and does not increase the risk of LTG-related complications in stage 0-I gastric cancer. However, these findings still need to be confirmed in a large clinical trial.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference28 articles.

1. Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Morita S, Yamada T, Bando E, Ito S, Takagi M, Takagane A, Teshima S et al. Survival outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA or IB gastric cancer (JCOG0912): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. The lancet Gastroenterology & hepatology 2019.

2. Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial;Kim HH;JAMA Oncol,2019

3. Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial;Liu F;JAMA Oncol,2020

4. Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial;Yu J;JAMA,2019

5. Time trends in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, and superficial esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma;Matsuno K;J Gastroenterol,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3