Affiliation:
1. Chengdu Surveying Geotechnical Research Institute, Co., Ltd. of MCC
2. Changsha University of Science and & Technology
Abstract
Abstract
To enhance the resistance against sliding and overturning in a cantilever retaining wall, the study introduces a heel plate at the base of the wall’s backside. This heel plate is designed to work with the wall's combined weight and the soil fill's weight placed on the heel plate. These components work together to mitigate the lateral forces produced by the soil fill. The objective is to efficiently and cost-effectively mitigate the seismic forces by integrating a cantilever retaining wall with a heel plate and pre-stressed rope, capitalising on the favourable seismic response characteristics. The study used the kinematical approach based on the upper bound theorem to examine the system's failure mechanism and critical yield acceleration coefficient involving a retaining wall, ropes, and soil. This framework identified two distinct failure modes: the long-heel baseplate failure mode and the short-heel baseplate failure mode. These failure modes were distinguished based on the second and third conditions for generating slip surfaces in the analysis. Assuming that the sliding surface of the backfill follows a straight line, this study applies the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion to establish critical state equations of pre-stressed ropes in a retaining wall with a heel, considering two distinct failure modes. Seismic yield acceleration coefficients are derived for each failure mode. Utilising the extremum principle, the study offers an optimal solution, including determining the critical yield acceleration coefficient and the associated inclination angle of the backfill sliding surface.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Chen WF. Limit analysis and soil plasticity. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Elsevier Science, 1975.
2. Derucher K N, Schelling D R, Patel V B. Methods and practice in cantilever retaining wall design[J]. Computers & Structures, 1978, 8(5): 569–582.
3. Evaluation of pseudostatic active earth pressure coefficient of cantilever retaining walls[J];Evangelista A;Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2010
4. Active earth thrust on cantilever walls with short heel[J];Greco VR;Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2001
5. Response and modeling of cantilever retaining walls subjected to seismic motions[J];Green RA;Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,2008