Challenges and Threats to Quality in Scholarly Knowledge Production: Views of Selected Stakeholders from 17 Countries

Author:

Starkey Jesse C.1,Koerber Amy1,Cummins Robert Glenn1,Ardon-Dryer Karin1,Eko Lyombe1,Kee Kerk F.1

Affiliation:

1. Texas Tech University

Abstract

Abstract This study applies Harvey and Green’s (1993) model of quality to scholarly knowledge production. Although studies of quality in higher education have been commonplace for decades, there is a gap in understanding quality in terms of research production from stakeholders’ perspectives. This study begins to fill that gap through a qualitative interview study of quality in the knowledge production process. Stakeholders in all parts of the scholarly knowledge production process, from 17 countries, are included in the data sample. Analysis of interview data extends Harvey and Green’s (1993) model into the realm of knowledge production. Definitions and challenges of quality in producing scholarly knowledge are discussed. The findings indicate a rift between the institutional view of quality and the individual perceptions of quality, suggesting the need for institutional policies that respond to stakeholders’ perceptions of quality in scholarly knowledge production and celebrate, rather than erase epistemic diversity.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference51 articles.

1. Epistemic diversity and cross-cultural comparative research: ontology, challenges, and outcomes;Xu X;Glob Soc Educ [Internet],2022

2. Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors;Newton DP;Account Res,2010

3. The role of peer review in Norwegian quality assurance: potential consequences for excellence and diversity;Langfeldt L;High Educ,2010

4. Johnson GJ, Tzanakou C, Ionescu I. An introduction to peer review [Internet]. Plotina, University of Warwick; 2018. www.plotina.eu

5. Fifteen years of quality in higher education (part two);Harvey L;Qual High Educ,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3