Assessment of the Correlation and Diagnostic Accuracy between CSF and Plasma AD Biomarkers: A Comparison of the Lumipulse and Simoa Platforms

Author:

Dakterzada Farida1,Cipriani Raffaela2,López-Ortega Ricard3,Arias Alfonso4,Riba-Llena Iolanda4,Ruiz-Julián Maria4,Huerto Raquel4,Tahan Nuria4,Matute Carlos5,Capetillo-Zarate Estibaliz5,Piñol-Ripoll Gerard4

Affiliation:

1. Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida

2. Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience

3. Laboratori Clínic ICS, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova

4. Hospital Universitari Santa Maria

5. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) plasma biomarkers related to amyloid (A), tau (T), and neurodegeneration (N) can potentially be used to identify these pathological features of the disease, as shown in recent studies. Our objective was to compare the clinical and analytical performance of plasma AD biomarkers measured using the single-molecule array (Simoa) and Lumipulse platforms. Methods We quantified ATN and AT plasma biomarkers in 127 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 81), AD (n = 30), and non-AD dementia (n = 16) using a Simoa HD-1/HD-X analyser (Quanterix) and a Lumipulse G600II automated platform (Fujirebio Europe NV). Results We found a strong correlation between the Simoa and Lumipulse methods, although there were systematic differences between biomarker values measured by each method. Concerning the clinical diagnosis, Simoa Ptau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.739, 95% CI 0.592–0.887) and Lumipulse Aβ42 and Ptau181/Aβ42 (AUC 0.735, 95% CI 0.589–0.882 and AUC 0.733, 95% CI 0.567-0.900) had the highest discriminating power. However, their power was significantly lower than that of CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, as measured by Lumipulse (AUC 0.879, 95% CI 0.766–0.992). Similarly, Simoa Ptau181 and Lumipulse Ptau181/Aβ42 were the markers most consistent with the CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 status (AUC 0.801, 95% CI 0.712–0.890 vs. AUC 0.870, 95% CI 0.806–0.934, respectively) at the ≥ 2.127 and ≥ 0.084 cut-offs, respectively. Conclusions The Simoa and Lumipulse plasma AD assays showed comparable clinical and analytical performance. However, the performance of these biomarkers is weaker than that of CSF AD biomarkers. Interestingly, both platforms identify plasma Ptau181/Aβ42 as a promising biomarker for AD. At present, the analysed AD plasma biomarkers may be useful for screening to reduce the number of lumbar punctures in the clinical setting. However, the use of these markers as diagnostic tools requires further investigation.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. APOE and Alzheimer’s disease: advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches;Serrano-Pozo A;Lancet Neurol,2021

2. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease;Jack CR;Alzheimers Dement,2018

3. Assessment of the Concordance and Diagnostic Accuracy Between Elecsys and Lumipulse Fully Automated Platforms and Innotest;Dakterzada F;Front Aging Neurosci,2021

4. Concordance Between Different Amyloid Immunoassays and Visual Amyloid Positron Emission Tomographic Assessment;Janelidze S;JAMA Neurol,2017

5. Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease in relation to neuropathology and cognitive change;Smirnov DS;Acta Neuropathol,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3