Protocol for the development and validation of a Polypharmacy Assessment Score for potentially problematic polypharmacy

Author:

Tsang Jung Yin1ORCID,Sperrin Matthew2,Blakeman Thomas1,Payne Rupert3,Ashcroft Darren M4

Affiliation:

1. The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health

2. Division of informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester

3. University of Exeter Medical School

4. NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration (GMPSRC), University of Manchester

Abstract

Abstract Background An increasing number of people are using multiple medications each day, named polypharmacy. This is driven by an ageing population, increasing multimorbidity, and single disease focussed guidelines. Medications carry obvious benefits, yet problematic polypharmacy is linked to adverse consequences including adverse drug events, drug-drug and drug-disease interactions, poor patient experience and wasted resources. There is a need to improve how we identify and evaluate these patients. Aim To produce a clinically representative PolypharmacyAssessment Score that can be implemented in practice to improve how we identify and evaluate people with potentially problematic polypharmacy Methods Analyses will be performed in three parts: 1. A regression model will explore predictors of polypharmacy and inform the development of a “Polypharmacy Assessment Score”. This will be constructed through calculating the discrepancies between the observed and expected count of prescribed medications, given an individual’s age, gender and clinical diagnoses, thereby highlighting people that have unexpected levels of prescribing and thus identifying potentially problematic polypharmacy. Parts 2 and 3 will examine different aspects of validity of the Polypharmacy Assessment Score: 2. To assess ‘construct validity’ of the score, cross-sectional analyses will evaluate high-risk prescribing (using both explicit and implicit measures of inappropriate prescribing) within populations with a range of different Polypharmacy Assessment Scores 3. To assess ‘predictive validity’ of the score, a retrospective cohort study will explore differences in clinical outcomes (adverse drug reactions, unplanned hospitalisation and all-cause mortality) between differing scores. Discussion Developing a robust and cross-cutting measure of polypharmacy has the potential to empower healthcare professionals to provide more effective and tailored care to patients with complex medication needs and better health outcomes. Our novel approach to producing a Polypharmacy Assessment Score uses unusual levels of prescribing to provide an indication of patients who may be at higher risk of potentially problematic polypharmacy.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference40 articles.

1. Duerden M, Avery T, Payne R. Polypharmacy and medicines optimisation. The King’s Fund. London, 2013.

2. The rising tide of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions: population database analysis 1995–2010;Guthrie B;BMC Med,2015

3. Polypharmacy in elderly patients;Hajjar ER;Am J Geriatr Pharmacother,2007

4. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study;Barnett K;The Lancet,2012

5. Avery AA, Barber N, Ghaleb M et al. Investigating the prevalence and causes of prescribing errors in general practice: the PRACtICe study. 2012.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3