360 Health Analysis (H360) – A comparison of key performance indicators in breast cancer management across health institution settings

Author:

Rego Inês Brandão1,Coelho Sara2,Semedo Patrícia Miguel3,Cavaco-Silva Joana4,Teixeira Laetitia5,Sousa Susana5,Reis Joana1,Dinis Rui6,Schmitt Fernando7,Afonso Noémia8,Fougo José Luís9,Pavão Francisco10,Leite Ricardo Baptista11,Costa Luís3

Affiliation:

1. Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João

2. Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil EPE

3. Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte

4. ScienceCircle - Scientific and Biomedical Consulting

5. Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto

6. Hospital do Espírito Santo de Évora

7. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto

8. Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho

9. Departamento de Cirurgia e Fisiologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto

10. Institute of Health Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa

11. Maastricht University, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background The increased focus on quality indicators (QIs) and the use of clinical registries in real-world cancer studies have led to higher compliance with therapeutic standards and increased patient survival. The European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) defined QIs to assess compliance with current standards in breast cancer care. Methods This population-based retrospective study is part of the H360 Health Analysis (H360) project - Phase 2 and represents the first comprehensive assessment of the quality of breast cancer care in different hospital settings in Portugal. Its aim is to describe compliance with EUSOMA-defined QIs in breast cancer management in different hospital settings (public vs. private; general hospitals vs. Oncology centers) and thereby assess equity in the provision of care across health institutions. To do so, a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) was selected based on EUSOMA and previously identified QIs. Secondary data were retrieved from patients’ clinical records. Compliance with target KPIs in different stages of disease across the considered hospital settings was compared with minimum and target EUSOMA standards. Results A total of 259 patient clinical records were assessed. In stage I, II, and III disease, eighteen KPIs met target EUSOMA standards, five met minimum standards, and eight failed to meet minimum standards. Compliance with KPIs varied according to the type of hospital (particularly concerning diagnosis) and stage of the disease. Conclusions Study results show that, although most QIs meet EUSOMA standards, there is room for improvement regarding diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. There are differences in the clinical practice across health institutions, particularly between Oncology centers and general hospitals regarding diagnosis and KPI compliance among disease stages. These findings should be addressed in future studies in a coordinated effort to improve the quality of breast cancer care nationally.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference20 articles.

1. The requirements of a specialist breast centre;Biganzoli L;Breast,2020

2. Identification of performance indicators across a network of clinical cancer programs;Khare SR;Curr Oncol,2016

3. Rosselli Del Turco M. Quality indicators in breast cancer care: An update from the EUSOMA working group;Biganzoli L;Eur J Cancer,2017

4. Cowppli-Bony A, Tretarre B, Marrer E, Defossez G, Daubisse-Marliac L, Coureau G, Minicozzi P, Woronoff AS, Delafosse P, Molinie F, network F. Compliance with clinical guidelines for breast cancer management: A population-based study of quality-of-care indicators in France. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0224275.

5. 360 Health Analysis (H360) - A Proposal for an Integrated Vision of Breast Cancer in Portugal;Coelho S;Eur J Breast Health,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3