Preferences of patients with severe mental disorders in social medical welfare policies: a discrete choice experiment from communities in China

Author:

Lu Wei1,Huang Qingzhi2,Zhu Junli1,Chen Yun2,Su Dai1,Chen Chen1,Xin Yu1

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health, Capital Medical University

2. The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Patients with severe mental disorders in China face a heavy financial burden and are in dire need of government support to help with medical costs. At present, the implementation of social medical welfare policies for patients with severe mental disorders in China has been ineffective. This study aims to study the participation preferences of patients for these policies, and provide a basis for the next path of policies improvement.Methods A questionnaire using the discrete choice experiment has been designed. Conditional logit regression and mixed logit regression models have been constructed based on the choice preference data, while relative importance and scenario prediction analysis have been adopted to measure the emphasis level of policy attributes in patients' minds.Results All four policy attributes affect patients' preferences for policy participation, while the attributes in descending order of relative importance are starting payment line(29.10%), reimbursement rate(25.40%), drug catalogue(24.19%), and designated medical institutions(21.31%).Patients significantly preferred the policy option with no starting payment line (p < 0.01). There are also differences in the attributes that patients with different characteristics consider critical when making choices.Conclusion This study has measured demand-side preferences for policy participation from the patient's perspective. The important finding obtained is that patients' preferences for policies attributes are closely influenced by the actual details of the policies in which they are currently or have previously participated and by their level of awareness at the time they make their judgments. The direction of policies adjustment can be grasped accordingly.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference45 articles.

1. The realization framework and path of the collaborative supply of community mental health services under the “Healthy China Strategy”;Zhong Y;Chin Health Policy Res,2020

2. The balanced care model for global mental health;Thornicroft G;Psychol Med,2013

3. World Health Organization (2013) Mental health action plan 2013–2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506021. Accessed March 18 2023

4. Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model;McGrew JH;J Consult Clin Psychol,1994

5. Do Community Free-Medication Service Policy Improve Patient Medication Adherence? A Cross-Sectional Study of Patients With Severe Mental Disorders in Beijing Community;Zhu J;Front Public Health,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3