Beliefs, Taboos, Usages, and Health Perceptions Toward Wildlife Among Different Ethnicities in Tak and Mae Hong Son Provinces, Thailand

Author:

Suwannarong Kanokwan1,Amonsin Alongkorn1,Ponlap Thanomsin2,Thammasutti Kannika1,Thongkan Worakamon2,Balthip Karnsunaphat3,Bubpa Nisachon4,Kanthawee Phitsanuruk5,Pummarak Sipapa6,Suwannarong Kangsadal7

Affiliation:

1. Center of Excellence for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases in Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

2. SUPA71 Co., Ltd

3. Faculty of Nursing, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand

4. Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand

5. School of Health Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand

6. Faculty of Nursing, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand

7. The Office of Disease Prevention and Control 7 Khon Kaen, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Abstract

Abstract This concurrent qualitative study studied wildlife beliefs, taboos, usages, and health perceptions among ten ethnic groups in four communities in Tak and Mae Hong Son, Thailand, from November 2020 to January 2021. Sixty-five respondents were selected for their extensive knowledge and active participation in wildlife culture and beliefs. Twenty (30.8%) participated in in-depth interviews (IDIs), while 45 (69.2%) participated in eight focused group discussions. The results showed that different ethnicities have different wildlife contact beliefs, taboos, usages, and health perceptions. Wildlife contact and consumption were thought to spread diseases, and cultural beliefs and taboos have helped some ethnic groups preserve nature and wildlife. Various ethnic groups have passed down traditions prohibiting the consumption of certain wild animals. The results may support developing disease prevention and intervention strategies to promote health literacy about wildlife contact risks by adapting villagers' socio-cultural beliefs and context characteristics by ethnicity.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference36 articles.

1. Shifting frames for local people and forests in a global heritage: the Thung Yai Naresuan Wildlife Sanctuary in the context of Thailand's globalization and modernization;Buergin R;Geoforum,2003

2. Puginier O. Planning, participation and policy: Hilltribes overcoming the dichotomy between agriculture and forest preservation in Northern Thailand. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit; 2002.

3. Influence of indigenous spiritual beliefs on natural resource management and ecological conservation in Thailand;Chunhabunyatip P;Sustainability,2018

4. Lasimbang J, Luithui C. Natural resource management country studies: Thailand. Regional Indigenous Peoples' Programme. Thailand, United Nations Development Programme Regional Centre in Bangkok ….

5. Awaiwanont N, Pongsopawijit P, Paulsen P. In: Bauer A, Smulders FJM, editors. Bushmeat consumption and possible risks to consumers in Thailand Paulsen P. Wageningen Academic; 2014.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3