Affiliation:
1. Institut Arnault Tzanck
2. Alphabio-biogroup
3. Bioesterel Biogroup
Abstract
Abstract
The objective of our work was to evaluate the screening of hepatic fibrosis in primary care using the FIB-4 score, automatically calculated. When the FIB-4 was ≥ 1.3, it was defined as positive, and ELF Test was performed. FIB-4 positivity was confirmed when ELF Test was ≥ 9.8. Results: Among the 3427 patients included in primary care, 869 (25%) had a positive FIB-4 score, 784 (22.5%) at intermediate (FIB-4: 1.3–2.67), and 85 (2.5%) at high risk of fibrosis (FIB-4 > 2.67). 509 (59%) of the FIB-4 positive were confirmed by the ELF Test. The percentage of confirmation was significantly higher in patients over 65 years (83 vs. 57%), with FIB-4 > 2.67 (80 vs. 56%), BMI > 25 (47 vs. 37%), and diabetes (24 vs. 14%), p = 0.001). In patients without known liver disease (92%), the practitioner identified a cause of disease in 27% of cases: mainly NAFLD and alcohol. Conclusion: Liver fibrosis was suspected on FIB-4 in 25% of patients who consulted a general practitioner. The ELF Test, performed as a second-line, improves the screening of liver fibrosis, particularly for FIB-4 indeterminate results. A positive FIB-4 test allows physicians to recognize a liver disease, providing an opportunity for timely intervention.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Burden of liver diseases in the world;Asrani SK;J Hepatol,2019
2. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes;Younossi ZM;Hepatology,2016
3. EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2015;European Association for Study of Liver;J Hepatol,2015
4. AASLD guidelines for treatment of chronic hepatitis B;Terrault NA;Hepatology,2016
5. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease;EASL-EASD-EASO;Journal of Hepatology,2016