Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System to Quantify the Severity of Incident Reports Using Machine Learning: An exploratory research study

Author:

Uematsu Haruhiro1,Uemura Masakazu1,Kurihara Masaru1,Umemura Tomomi1,Hiramatsu Mariko1,Kitano Fumimasa1,Fukami Tatsuya2,Nagao Yoshimasa1

Affiliation:

1. Nagoya University Hospital

2. Shimane University Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Incident reporting systems have been widely adopted to collect information about patient safety incidents. The value of incident reports often lies in the free-text section, but this is often inadequately processed. We developed a novel scoring system that uses machine learning to assess the severity of an incident using the semantic characteristics of text in incident reports. We retrospectively analyzed free-text data extracted from incident reports from between January 2012 and September 2021 at Nagoya University Hospital, Aichi, Japan. The sample was randomly allocated into a training dataset and validation dataset. Morphological analysis was used to segment terms using the training dataset. We calculated a severity term score, a severity report score and severity group score, by the report volume size. We then compared these with conventional severity classifications by patient safety experts and reporters. We allocated 96,082 incident reports into two groups. From the 48,041 reports in the training dataset, 1,802 severity term scores were calculated. There was a significant difference in severity report score between reports categorized as severe and not severe by experts (95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.83 to − 0.80, p < 0.001). Severity group scores were positively associated with severity ratings from experts and reporters, with correlation coefficients of 0.73 (95% CI 0.63–0.80, p < 0.001) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.71–0.85, p < 0.001) for all departments. Our severity scoring system using machine learning could contribute to improved organizational patient safety.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference29 articles.

1. Kohn KT, C.J., Donaldson MS, To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System.. 1999: Washington, DC.

2. Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned?;Leape LL;Jama,2005

3. Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: Progress, but Still a "Chasm";Dzau VJ;Jama,2020

4. Where we are a decade after To err is human;Clancy CM;J Patient Saf,2009

5. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research;Sexton JB;BMC Health Serv Res,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3