Examining Pessary Use and Satisfaction in Managing Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Results From a Cross-Sectional Multicentre Patient Survey

Author:

Mussawar Minhal1,Khademioore Sahar2,Chandra Astha3,Hanafimosalman Mehrshad3,Chan Garson1

Affiliation:

1. University of Saskatchewan

2. McMaster University

3. McGill University

Abstract

Abstract

Background Vaginal pessaries are a common method of managing pelvic organ prolapse (POP), as well as different types of urinary incontinence, allowing patients to successfully improve overall quality of life. Yet despite their positive attributes, there are several reasons why patients may choose to discontinue using pessaries and proceed with surgery to treat their condition instead. This study aimed to examine the factors associated with successful and unsuccessful pessary fittings, explore ideal characteristics of a pessary from a patient's perspective, and explore patients' experiences of pessary use in treating POP. Methods Participants completed an online survey regarding pessary use and ideal characteristics of a pessary. Participants were recruited from social media advertisements, online support groups for women’s health-related conditions, and pelvic floor clinics. Results A total of 100 participants were recruited, of which 77 fully completed the survey. Respondents cited pelvic pain, excess vaginal discharge and odor, as well as difficulty with pessary placement as the most common issues related to pessary use. Easy insertion, removal, and relief from side effects were the most commonly reported ideal characteristics for pessary use. Conclusion Patients had important concerns with pessary use and a high number either stopped or were considering stopping even when it improved their POP. Whilst pessaries can help in the management of POP, further improvement is warranted to increase pessary use, such as through the development of user-friendly designs, or applicators to aid with fitting.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3