Affiliation:
1. Chiba University Hospital
2. Matsudo City General Hospital
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common disease of the hip in adults and its etiology is divided into two groups: primary or idiopathic. Although acetabular dysplasia is the most frequent reason for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Japan, primary OA has increased recently. Although there are two types of femoral head migration in primary OA: superior and medial, there are some patients with prominent femoral head lateralization. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between femoral head lateralization and bone morphology of the acetabulum and proximal femur using radiographic factors in primary OA of the hip.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted between 2008 and 2017 to assess 1308 hips with OA who underwent primary THAs at our institute. The diagnostic criteria for primary OA were Crowe type 1, Sharp’s angle < 45°, and center-edge (CE) angle > 25°. We classified patients with primary OA into two groups based on femoral head lateralization: group L with lateralization or group N without. Radiographic factors included Sharp’s angle, CE angle, acetabular inclination, acetabular depth ratio (ADR), acetabular head index (AHI), and femoral neck-shaft angle (FNA), all examined on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. Femoral neck anteversion was calculated using computerized axial tomography.
Results
Primary OA was diagnosed in 210/1308 hips (16.1%) (group L: 112 hips [8.6%]; group N: 98 [7.5%]). Patient demographics were not significantly different. Radiographic factors with observed significant differences between group L and group N were average CE angle (33.0° vs 35.1°, respectively, p = 0.009), ADR (251.6 vs 273.4, p < 0.001), AHI (77.2 vs 80.4, p < 0.001), and FNA (136.9° vs 134.8°, p = 0.012).
Conclusions
This investigation suggests that primary OA with femoral head lateralization demonstrated specific identifiable radiographic characteristics in the acetabulum and proximal femur that might contribute to hip joint instability such as the dysplastic hip.
Trial registration:
The research protocol for this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the authors’ affiliated institutions in compliance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating subjects.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Idiopathic OA of the hip: incidence, classification, and natural history of 272 cases;Hartofilakidis G;J Orthopedics,2003
2. SoFCOT Total Hip Arthroplasty Register Biannual report 2018. Part I: Primary total hip arthroplasty. Available at: http://www.sofcot.fr/10-registre-national/registre-national.asp, 2018
3. Karrholm J, Lindahl H, Malchau H, Mohaddes M, Nemes S, Rogmark C, et al. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2016. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, September 2017; p30–31.
4. OA hip joints in Japan: involvement of acetabular dysplasia;Jingushi S;J Orthop Sci,2011
5. Hip dysplasia and osteoarthrosis: a survey of 4151 subjects from the Osteoarthrosis Substudy of the Copenhagen City Heart Study;Jacobsen S;Acta Orthop,2005