The prognostic value of the NECPAL instrument, Palliative Prognostic Index, and PROFUND index in elderly residents of nursing homes with advanced chronic condition

Author:

Esteban-Burgos Ana Alejandra1,Hueso-Montoro César1,Mota-Romero Emilio2,Montoya-Juárez Rafael3,Gómez-Batiste Xavier4,García-Caro María Paz3

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Enfermería. Universidad de Jaén

2. Centro de Salud Salvador Caballero. Distrito Sanitario Granada-Metropolitano. Servicio Andaluz de Salud

3. Departamento de Enfermería. Universidad de Granada

4. Cátedra de Cuidados Paliativos, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVIC-UCC)

Abstract

Abstract Background: It is essential to assess the need for palliative care and the life prognosis of elderly nursing home residents with an advanced chronic condition, and the NECPAL ICO-CCOMS©4.0 prognostic instrument may be adequate for both purposes. The objective of this study was to examine the predictive capacity of NECPAL, the Palliative Prognosis Index, and the PROFUND index in elderly residents with advanced chronic condition with and without dementia, comparing their results at different time points. Methods: This prospective observational study was undertaken in eight nursing homes, following the survival of 146 residents with advanced chronic condition (46.6% with dementia) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The capacity of the three instruments to predict mortality was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with 95% confidence interval, for the global population and separately for residents with and without dementia. Results: The mean age of residents was 84.63 years (±8.989 yrs); 67.8% were female. The highest predictive capacity was found for PROFUND at 3 months (95%CI: 0.526-0.756; p=0.016), for PROFUND and NECPAL at 12 months (non-significant; AUC >0.5), and NECPAL at 24 months (close-to-significant (AUC=0.624; 95% CI: 0.499-0.750; p=0.053). The highest capacity at 12 months was obtained using PROFUND in residents with dementia (AUC=0.698; 95%CI: 0.566-0.829; p=0.003) and NECPAL in residents without dementia (non-significant; AUC=0.649; 95%CI: 0.432-0.867; p=0.178). Significant differences in AUC values were observed between PROFUND at 12 (p=0.017) and 24 (p=0.028) months. Conclusions: PROFUND offers the most accurate prediction of survival in elderly care home residents with advanced chronic condition overall and in those with dementia, especially over the short term, whereas NECPAL ICO-CCOMS©4.0 appears to be the most useful to predict the long-term survival of residents without dementia. These results support early evaluation of the need for palliative care in elderly care home residents with advanced chronic condition.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference60 articles.

1. Organización M, de la Salud OMS. Cuidados paliativos [Internet]. Organizacion mundial de la salud. 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care

2. Blay C, Limón E. Bases para un modelo catalán de atención a las personas con necesidades complejas [Internet]. Vol. 6, Generalitat de Catalunya. Programa de prevenció i atenció a la cronicitat. 2017. Available from: http://salutweb.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/ambits_tematics/linies_dactuacio/model_assistencial/atencio_al_malalt_cronic/documents/bases_modelo_personas_complejidad_v_6.pdf

3. Consejería de Salud y Familia. Cuidados Paliativos. Proceso Asistencial Integrado [Internet]. 2019. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10668/3026

4. End of life care for long-term care residents with dementia, chronic illness and cancer: Prospective staff survey;Boyd M;BMC Geriatr,2019

5. Thomas K, Wilson JA, Team GSF. The Gold Standards Framework - Proactive Identification Guidance (PIG). 2016;6:2. Available from: https://www.goldstandardsframework.org.uk/cd-content/uploads/files/PIG/NEW PIG – 20.1.17 KT vs17.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3