Repeatability and reproducibility of VR in automated measurement and diagnosis of strabismus

Author:

Fu Jing1ORCID,Wang Yumeng2,Liu Jiawen1,Chen Weiwei1,Jiang Meixia3

Affiliation:

1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Beijing, China.

2. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

3. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology &Visual Sciences,Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Abstract

Background To explore the accuracy and reproducibility of VR technology for strabismus screening.Methods In this cross-sectional study, a total of 191 subjects were included. Examinations included VR technology based on infrared, the cover-uncover test, and the prism alternating cover test (PACT) at various gaze positions, specifically at distances of 33cm and 6m. The accuracy of VR in diagnosing strabismus and quantifying the degree of strabismus was evaluated by comparing the VR results to the average outcomes of manual examinations conducted by the two physicians, considered the gold standard.Results A total of 88 healthy individuals, 81 exotropia patients, 17 esotropia patients, and 5 vertical strabismus patients were included in this study, and each subject was screened for less than 2 min. The sensitivity of VR for screening strabismus was 80.3% and the specificity was 80%, displaying moderately consistent with the manual results (Kappa = 0.598, p < 0.001). The sensitivity for diagnosing exotropia was 76.5% and the specificity was 91.8%, also showing strong agreement with the manual results (Kappa = 0.695, p < 0.001). The sensitivity for diagnosing esotropia was 94.1% and the specificity was 95.4%, with strong agreement with the manual results (Kappa = 0.755, p < 0.001). The sensitivity for diagnosing vertical strabismus was 80% and the specificity was 98.9%, with strong agreement with manual results (Kappa = 0.719, p < 0.001). Reproducibility of VR compared to manual results, expressed as intraclass correlation efficient (ICC), was moderately reproducible for exotropia in near mode (ICC = 0.587, range, -0.036-0.826) and less reproducible for exotropia in far mode (ICC = 0.349, range, -0.042-0.615). ICC was highly reproducible (ICC = 0.701, range,0.358–0.879) for the esotropic far mode results (6m) and not statistically significant for the esotropic near mode results (33cm). ICC was moderately reproducible (ICC = 0.606, range, -0.143-0.946) for the vertical-near-mode results (33cm) and not statistically significant for the vertical-far-mode results (6m).Conclusions This novel technique for strabismus screening, which utilizes virtual reality technology, enables quick, precise, and straightforward diagnosis of strabismus. It has also shown notable efficacy in accurately measuring the angle of deviation in cases of exotropia.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference11 articles.

1. What Is Strabismus? [J];Kraus C;JAMA,2023

2. Epidemiology of strabismus [J];Stidwill D;Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,1997

3. Strabismus [J];Ticho BH;Pediatr Clin North Am,2003

4. Catalano JD. Strabismus [J]. Pediatr Ann, 1990, 19(5): 289, 92-, 97.

5. Limitations of cover test in detecting strabismus [J];Romano PE;Am J Ophthalmol,1971

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3