Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for the ventral versus the dorsal areas of segment 8

Author:

Oji Kentaro1,Urade Takeshi1,Kido Masahiro1,Komatsu Shohei1,Gon Hidetoshi1,Yamasaki Nobuaki1,Fukushima Kenji1,So Shinichi1,Yoshida Toshihiko1,Arai Keisuke1,Akita Masayuki1,Ishida Jun1,Nanno Yoshihide1,Tsugawa Daisuke1,Asari Sadaki1,Yanagimoto Hiroaki1,Toyama Hirochika1,Fukumoto Takumi1

Affiliation:

1. Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose: The technical difficulties of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) are greatly associated with the location of liver tumors. Since segment 8 (S8) contains a wide area, the difficulty of LLR for S8 tumors may vary depending on the location within the segment, such as the ventral (S8v) and dorsal (S8d) area, but the difference is unclear. Methods: We retrospectively investigated 30 patients who underwent primary laparoscopic partial liver resection for liver tumors in S8 at Kobe University Hospital between January 2018 and June 2023. Results: Thirteen and 17 patients underwent LLR for S8v and S8d, respectively. The operation time was significantly longer (S8v 203[135-259] vs. S8d 261[186-415] min, P = 0.002) and the amount of blood loss was significantly higher (10[10-150] vs. 10[10-200] mL, P = 0.034) in the S8d group than in the S8v group. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications or the postoperative length of hospital stay. Additionally, intraoperative findings revealed that the rate at which the case performed partial liver mobilization in the S8d group was higher (2[15.4%] vs. 8[47.1%], P = 0.060) and the median parenchymal transection time of the S8d group was longer (102[27-148] vs. 129[37-175] min, P = 0.097) than that of the S8v group, but there were no significant differences. Conclusion: The safety of LLR for the S8d was comparable to that of LLR for the S8v, although LLR for the S8d resulted in longer operative time and more blood loss. The trial registration number: B230165 (approved at December 26th 2023)

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3