Optimising the diagnostic accuracy of First post-contrAst SubtracTed breast MRI (FAST MRI) through interpretation-training: a multicentre e-learning study, mapping the learning curve of NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) mammogram readers using an enriched dataset

Author:

Jones Lyn I1,Marshall Andrea2,Geach Rebecca1,Elangovan Premkumar3,O’Flynn Elizabeth4,Timlin Tony1,McKeown-Keegan Sadie1,Rose Janice5,Vinnicombe Sarah6,Taylor-Phillips Sian2,Halling-Brown Mark3,Dunn Janet A2

Affiliation:

1. North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital

2. University of Warwick

3. Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

4. St George’s University Hospitals Foundation Trust

5. Independent Cancer Patients’ Voice

6. Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Abstract Background: Abbreviated breast MRI (FAST MRI) is being introduced into clinical practice. Specificity optimisation is essential to minimise harm through false positive results for populations with low pre-test probability. This study aimed to optimise diagnostic accuracy through the adaptation of a FAST MRI interpretation-training programme. Methods: A FAST MRI interpretation-training programme was adapted to provide additional training during the assessment task (interpretation of an enriched dataset of 125 FAST MRI scans) by giving readers feedback about the true outcome of each scan immediately after each scan was interpreted (formative assessment). The training programme was additionally adapted for remote e-learning delivery. Study design: prospective, blinded interpretation of an enriched dataset by multiple readers. Results: 43 mammogram readers completed the training, 22 who interpreted breast MRI in their clinical role (Group 1) and 21 who did not (Group 2). Overall sensitivity was 83% (95%CI 81-84%; 1994/2408), specificity 94% (95%CI 93–94%; 7806/8338), readers’ agreement with the true outcome kappa = 0.75 (95%CI 0.74-0.77) and diagnostic odds ratio = 70.67 (95%CI 61.59-81.09). Group 1 readers showed similar sensitivity (84%) to Group 2 (82% p=0.14), but slightly higher specificity (94% v. 93%, p=0.001). Concordance with the ground truth increased significantly with the number of FAST MRI scans read through the formative assessment task (p=0.002) but by differing amounts depending on whether or not a reader had previously attended FAST MRI training (interaction p=0.02). Concordance with the ground truth was significantly associated with reading batch size (p=0.02), tending to worsen when more than 50 scans were read per batch. Group 1 took a median of 56 seconds (range 8-47466) to interpret each FAST MRI scan compared with 78 seconds (14-22830, p <0.0001) for Group 2. Conclusions: Provision of immediate feedback to mammogram readers during the assessment test set reading task increased specificity for FAST MRI interpretation and achieved high diagnostic accuracy. Optimal reading-batch size for FAST MRI was 50 reads per batch. Trial registration (25/09/2019): ISRCTN16624917

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference37 articles.

1. Bakker MF, De Lange S V., Pijnappel RM, Mann RM, Peeters PHM, Monninkhof EM, et al. Supplemental MRI screening for women with extremely dense breast tissue. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2019;381(22):2091–102. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1903986

2. Veenhuizen SG, De Lange S V., Bakker MF, Pijnappel RM, Mann RM, Monninkhof EM, et al. Supplemental Breast MRI for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts: Results of the Second Screening Round of the DENSE Trial. Radiology [Internet]. 2021;00:1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021203633

3. Comstock CE, Gatsonis C, Newstead GM, Snyder BS, Gareen IF, Bergin JT, et al. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association [Internet]. 2020;323(8):746–56. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2761645

4. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, Schild HH, Hilgers RD, Bieling HB. Abbreviated breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): First postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection - A novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. Journal of Clinical Oncology [Internet]. 2014;32:2304–10. Available from: https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.5386

5. Vinnicombe S, Harvey H, Healy N. Introduction of an abbreviated breast MRI service in the UK as part of the BRAID trial: practicalities, challenges and future directions. Clin Radiol [Internet]. 2021;76(6):427–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2021.01.020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3