Work-related fear-avoidance beliefs and risk of low-back pain: Prospective cohort study among healthcare workers
Author:
Jakobsen Markus Due1, Vinstrup Jonas1, Andersen Lars Louis1
Affiliation:
1. National Research Centre for the Working Environment
Abstract
Abstract
PURPOSE
Low-back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition among healthcare workers, negatively affecting well-being and work ability. Research has identified fear-avoidance beliefs, i.e. the belief that physical activities worsen or prolong pain, as a key psychological factor in LBP. Given the physical demands of healthcare work, understanding the link between fear-avoidance and LBP is crucial for effective prevention and management strategies. This study investigated the prospective association between fear-avoidance beliefs and risk of increased LBP intensity and duration in hospital workers.
METHODS
Fear-avoidance beliefs and LBP were assessed in 1,933 healthcare workers from 389 departments at 19 hospitals at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Associations between baseline work-related fear-avoidance beliefs (FABW) and LBP intensity and duration at follow-up were analyzed using cumulative logistic regression, adjusting for various factors including age, sex, baseline LBP, education, seniority, patient transfers, psychosocial work environment, and lifestyle.
RESULTS
Moderate and high FABW was associated with higher odds of increased pain intensity (OR: 1.37 [95% CI: 1.09–1.73] and 1.85 [95% CI: 1.18–2.88], respectively) and prolonged pain duration (OR: 1.37 [95% CI: 1.05–1.78] and 2.27 [95% CI: 1.50–3.44], respectively). A sensitivity analysis including only female nurses showed similar results, with the high FABW group having significantly higher odds of increased pain intensity (OR 2.95, 95% CI: 1.84–4.72) and duration (OR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.55–4.49).
CONCLUSIONS
Fear-avoidance beliefs increase the risk of LBP intensity and duration among healthcare workers, emphasizing the need for interventions dealing with psychological aspects of LBP.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Organization WH, HEALTH WORKFORCE REQUIREMENTS FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE AND THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, GOALS. World Health Organization, No. 1 to the Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health. No. 1, 2016. [Online]. Tilgængelig hos: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250330/9789241511407-;jsessionid=A90E6A906BDBB9AB304CD01301DA019A?sequence=1. 2. Joshua og R, Karkada S. A Review on Occupational Health Hazards and its Consequences among Nurses, IJNRP, bd. 4, nr. 2, dec. 2017, 10.15509/IJNRP.2017.4.2.353. 3. Holtzclaw L, Arlinghaus KR, Johnston ogCA. The Health of Health Care Professionals, American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, bd. 15, nr. 2, s. 130–132, mar. 2021, 10.1177/1559827620977065. 4. Marras WS, Parakkat J, Chany AM, Yang G, Burr D, Lavender ogSA. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience, Clinical Biomechanics, bd. 21, nr. 4, s. 345–352, maj 2006, 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.10.004. 5. Theilmeier A, Jordan C, Luttmann A, Jäger ogM. Measurement of action forces and posture to determine the lumbar load of healthcare workers during care activities with patient transfers, Ann Occup Hyg, bd. 54, nr. 8, s. 923–933, nov. 2010, 10.1093/annhyg/meq063.
|
|