Affiliation:
1. Tarbiat Modares University
2. Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
3. Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR)-Khuzestan
4. Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Workplace stress is a serious workplace hazard, especially for high-stress occupations such as healthcare workers. Identifying valid and reliable tools to measure conditions related to workplace stress is essential for targeted interventions. The aim of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the revised version of the Health & Safety Executive Indicator Tool (HSE).
Methods: An item pool was generated based on the HSE Indicator Tool and the findings of a qualitative study. After face and content validity, the psychometric properties of the instrument were examined. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated to assess reliability.
Results: A total of 220 health care workers from 80 primary health care centers in 5 cities in Iran completed the Health & Safety Executive-Developed Occupational Stress Indicator Tool (HSE-DOSIT). In exploratory factor analysis, 35 items were loaded, which indicated a 9-factor solution for the questionnaire. Six factors were the same as the original UK version (Superior support, Demands, Job control, Social support, Changes, and Relationships) and three new factors were added (Non-job factors, Cognitive structure and Individual context). Cronbach's alpha (0.949), MacDonald Omega (from 0.739 to 0.894), and intra-class correlation coefficient (0.92) were acceptable
Conclusions: Overall, the results show that the HSE-DOSIT is reliable and valid. In other words, HSE-DOSIT can be useful for identifying organizational, social and individual factors related to workplace stress and implementing targeted interventions. However, further evaluation of HSE-DOSIT is recommended.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Workplace Stress: A collective challenge. [cited 2018 Feb 28]; Available from: http://www.ilo.org/safework/info/publications/WCMS_466547/lang--en/index.htm
2. Decreasing employees’ work stress by a participatory, organizational level work stress prevention approach: a multiple-case study in primary education;Bakhuys Roozeboom MC;BMC Public Health,2020
3. Dealing with the demands: Strategies healthcare communication professionals use to cope with workplace stress;Gilstrap CM;Qual Res Reports Commun,2017
4. Effects of work stress on ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rate variability;Vrijkotte TGM;Hypertension,2000
5. Menghini L, Balducci C, Toderi S. Italian adaptation of Warr’s Job-related Affective Well-being Scale: Factorial structure and relationships with the HSE Management Standards Indicator Tool. TPM-Testing, Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol. 2022;29:309–25.