Sensory Modality Influence on Human Reinforcement Learning: Different Response Time but Consistent Performance

Author:

Sun Wenhan1,Ripp Isabelle1,Borrmann Aylin2,Moll Maximilian2,Fairhurst Merle3

Affiliation:

1. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

2. University of the Bundeswehr Munich

3. TU Dresden

Abstract

Abstract Previous studies have observed an intriguing overconfidence in the haptic sense. However, the impact of this increased sensory confidence on learning behavior relative to other senses has remained unexplored. This online study sought to investigate human learning behavior across the visual, auditory and haptic sensory modalities in a probabilistic selection task on computers and mobile devices. We examined reaction time, as an indicator for confidence, learning speed, and task accuracy. The haptic based probabilistic selection task showed the fastest reaction time, reinforcing the notion of heightened perceptual confidence in haptics. Conversely, visual stimuli processing exhibited the slowest reaction time and auditory based responses occupied an intermediate position. Despite the differences in reaction time across the senses, all modalities showed a striking consistency in both learning speed and task accuracy. In line with recent theories, the consistent learning outcomes across sensory modalities could be attributed to modality-independent meta-representations, which prioritise relevant information for decision-making. In addition, our data revealed that reaction time on touch-based mobile devices was significantly faster than those on computers. The combination of faster reaction time in the haptic modality without sacrificing accuracy and the enhanced efficiency of touch-based interfaces advocate for the integration of haptics in technological designs to boost efficiency while maintaining a high level of precision.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference59 articles.

1. Confidence is higher in touch than in vision in cases of perceptual ambiguity;Fairhurst MT;Sci Rep,2018

2. The Development of Tactile Perception;Bremner AJ;Adv Child Dev Behav,2017

3. Cross-modal metacognition: Visual and tactile confidence share a common scale;Klever L;Journal of Vision,2023

4. Deroy, O. & Fairhurst, M. Spatial certainty: Feeling is the truth. https://philpapers.org/rec/DERSC-2 (2019).

5. Armstrong, D. M. Bodily sensations. (Taylor & Francis, 2023).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3