Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Marginal Gap Evaluation Using Various Self-Adhesive Resin Cements by SEM

Author:

Shely Asaf1,Nissan Joseph1,Lugassy Diva1,Rosner Ofir1,Zenziper Eran1,Egbaria Tharaa1,Ben-Izhack Gil1

Affiliation:

1. Tel Aviv University

Abstract

Abstract Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of three different self-adhesive resin cements on the marginal gap of full monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) single crowns. Methods: We divided forty-five typodont teeth, fully prepared for full monolithic crowns, into three groups (fifteen each) for the use of three different self-adhesive resin cements. We created a fourth control group (Temp-bond) by taking five teeth from each group before cementation with self-adhesive resin cements. All forty-five abutments were scanned using Primescan (an intra-oral scanner (IOS)), followed by digital design and grinding of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) crowns with a four-axis machine. We first cemented the crowns of the control group (Temp-bond) and evaluated the marginal gap using a scanning electronic microscope (SEM). After removing the crowns from the abutments, we cemented the crowns for each group using a different self-adhesive resin cement and observed them under the SEM to evaluate the marginal gap. We used a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, which found no normal distribution in the study variables (p < 0.05), followed by Mann-Whitney tests (α = .05). Results: The total mean marginal gap of the control group (24.67 ± 4.43 µm) was significantly lower compared to the self-adhesive resin cements groups (p < 0.0005). The total mean marginal gap of the G-cem ONE group (50.48 ± 6.38 µm) was significantly lower compared to the TheraCem group (p < 0.026) and RelyX U200 group (P < 0.008). The total mean marginal gap of the TheraCem group (66.28 ± 7.23 µm) was significantly higher than the G-cem ONE group (p < 0.026) but showed no significant difference with the RelyX U200 group (70.07 ± 10.12 µm, p > 0.110). Conclusions: All four groups showed a clinically acceptable marginal gap (< 120 microns). Although all three groups of self-adhesive resin cements demonstrated a significant increase in the marginal gap compared to Temp-bond group, they were within the limits of clinical acceptability. Regarding the marginal gap, in everyday dentistry it is recommended to use G-cem ONE self-adhesive resin cement for ZLS single crowns.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3