Novel Gene Signatures Predictive of Patient Recurrence-free Survival in HR+HER2- Breast Cancer
Author:
Jin Ming-Liang1, Jin Xi1, Shao Zhi-Ming1
Affiliation:
1. Fudan University, Fudan University
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Predicting relapse-free survival (RFS) and understanding the molecular characteristics of endocrine therapy resistance are crucial for determining the treatment decision-making process in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients. To address this, the main purpose of this study was to develop a signature to predict RFS in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients
Methods
We analyzed transcriptome and clinical data from 856 patients with HR + HER2- breast cancer in the FUSCC cohort and 1140 patients in the METABRIC cohort. We identified 21 genes that were differentially expressed between endocrine therapy-sensitive and endocrine therapy -resistant tumors. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and stepwise Cox regression analysis, we developed a 13-gene signature, named the endocrine therapy resistant prognosis signature (ETRPS), to predict RFS in HR+/HER2-related breast cancer patients.
Results
Our analysis identified 21 genes that were differentially expressed between endocrine therapy-sensitive and endocrine therapy-resistant tumors. The ETRPS, a 13-gene signature, effectively predicted RFS in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients, even in patients with negative lymph nodes. To validate the utility of ETRPS, we applied it to five external cohorts, demonstrating its widespread application value.
Conclusion
These findings provide valuable insights into the prediction of RFS and endocrine therapy resistance in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients. The ETRPS signature may serve as a useful tool for determining treatment decision-making processes and for predicting patient outcomes in this breast cancer subtype.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient- level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. The Lancet 386, 1341–1352. 2. Aljohani, A.I., Joseph, C., Kurozumi, S., Mohammed, O.J., Miligy, I.M., Green, A.R., and Rakha, E.A. Myxovirus resistance 1 (MX1) is an independent predictor of poor outco me in invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 181, 541–551. 3. André, F., Ciruelos, E., Rubovszky, G., Campone, M., Loibl, S., Rugo, H.S., Iwata, H., Conte, P., Mayer, I.A., Kaufman, B., et al. Alpelisib for < i > PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive Advance d Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 380, 1929–1940. 4. Baselga, J., Campone, M., Piccart, M., Burris, H.A., III, Rugo, H.S., Sahmoud, T., Noguchi, S., Gnant, M., Pritchard, K.I., Lebrun, F., et al. Everolimus in Postmenopausal Hormone-Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 366, 520–529. 5. Burstein, H.J. Systemic Therapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 383, 2557–2570.
|
|