Affiliation:
1. Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Distinct clinical phenotypes of pathological fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings may affect neonatal outcomes differently. This study aimed to determine and differentiate neonatal outcomes amongst the clinical phenotypes of pathological FHR tracing.
Methods
This prospective observational study included women in labour with pathological fetal heart rate tracing during delivery. Pathological fetal heart rate tracings were characterized into 11 clinical phenotypes and corresponding neonatal and maternal outcomes were recorded. Neonates and mothers were followed till discharge from the hospital. The primary outcome was a 5-minute APGAR score. The secondary outcomes were NICU admission, mode of delivery, mode of anesthesia, neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Result
271 women with pathological fetal heart rate tracing at the time of delivery were included in the study. Most of the women (64%) underwent cesarean delivery. The most common pathological fetal heart rate tracing was repetitive late decelerations (24.7%), followed by reduced variability with repetitive variable decelerations (24.4%). The 5-minute APGAR score was comparable across all clinical phenotypes of pathological fetal heart rate tracing. Tachycardia with reduced variability was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of NICU admission (aOR = 5.03, 95% CI: 1.32–19.27, p = 0.018). Reduced variability, repetitive late decelerations and the combination of repetitive late decelerations with prolonged decelerations and reduced variability showed moderately increased odds of NICU admission.
Conclusions
The 5-minute APGAR score remained comparable in all clinical phenotypes of pathological fetal heart rate tracing. Nonetheless, the odds of NICU admission were significantly higher in women with tachycardia and reduced variability.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography;Ayres-de-Campos D;Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2015
2. Practice bulletin 116: Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings;American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists;Obstet Gynecol,2010
3. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour;Alfirevic Z;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017
4. Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing;Devane D;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017
5. Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring;Arnold JJ;Am Fam Physician,2020