Affiliation:
1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for Circadian Metabolism and Cardiovascular Disease, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University; Chongqing, China
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the correlation between the heparin dose and activated clotting time (ACT) during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) under different antithrombotic management backgrounds and to provide evidence for the rational use of heparin in LAAC.
Methods
Patients with NVAF who underwent LAAC in our hospital from February 2017 to March 2021 were evaluated. The patients were grouped according to the type of antithrombotic therapy they received before LAAC and the international normalised ratio (INR) into the following groups: patients on antiplatelet drugs, patients on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, patients with a warfarin INR < 1.8, and patients with a warfarin INR ≥ 1.8. The heparin doses were 100, 100, 100, and 80 U/kg, respectively. To measure ACT, venous blood samples were collected at 15 minutes after administering the drug.
Results
The study enrolled 435 patients, comprising 135, 155, 107, and 78 in the antiplatelet drug, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, warfarin INR < 1.8, and, warfarin INR ≥ 1.8 groups, respectively. At baseline, the proportion of patients with coronary heart disease was significantly lower in the warfarin INR < 1.8 group than in the other three groups (p < 0.01), while there were no significant differences in other parameters among the groups (p > 0.05). The heparin dose was significantly lower in the warfarin INR ≥ 1.8 group (80.25 ± 2.84 U/kg) than in the other three groups (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the ACT among the four groups (p > 0.05). LAAC was completed in all 435 patients without perioperative bleeding or thromboembolic complications.
Conclusions
For patients not taking warfarin or with an INR < 1.8 on warfarin before LAAC, it is reasonable to use heparin at a dose of 100 U/kg. It is safe and effective to reduce the heparin dose by 20% in patients with an INR ≥ 1.8.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Initial Worldwide Experience With the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation;Sick PB;J Am Coll Cardiol,2007
2. Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN in patients with or without contraindication to oral anticoagulation: 1-Year follow-up outcome data of the EWOLUTION trial;Boersma LV;Heart Rhythm,2017
3. Implant success and safety of left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device: peri-procedural outcomes from the EWOLUTION registry;Boersma LVA;Eur Heart J,2016
4. Chinese expert consensus on the prevention. of stroke by left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation (2019).Chinese Journal of Cardiology2019(12):937–938.
5. Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, Mandrola J, Camm AJ, Lip G, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update. Europace; 2019.