Affiliation:
1. University College of medical Sciences
2. AIIMS
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Risk scoring systems are required to allow accurate prognostication, compare outcomes of surgery and allow patients to make informed decisions about their health. This prospective study compares the p-POSSUM (Portsmouth modification to Physiological and operative severity score for enumeration of mortality ), Mannheim Peritonitis Index and Jabalpur Peritonitis Index for their utility in predicting mortality in patients with peritonitis.
METHODS : Perioperative data was collected from 235 patients with secondary peritonitis and used to calculate p-POSSUM, MPI and JPI scores. The accuracy of the 3 scores was compared using receiver operator characteristic curves.
RESULTS : p-POSSUM and Mannheim Peritonitis Index were similar in their accuracy with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.756 and 0.757. Jabalpur Peritonitis Index had an AUC of 0.665.
Conclusion: p-POSSUM and Mannheim Peritonitis Index can be used to predict mortality in patients with secondary peritonitis. Jabalpur Peritonitis Index is not suited for this purpose. Further studies are required to improve the diagnostic performance of p-POSSUM and MPI in patients with secondary peritonitis.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Spalding DRC, Williamson RCN. Peritonitis. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) [Internet]. 2008 Jan;69(1):M12-5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18293728
2. Complicated intra-abdominal infections worldwide: The definitive data of the CIAOW Study;Sartelli M;World J Emerg Surg,2014
3. Peritonitis - The Western experience;Malangoni MA;World J Emerg Surg,2006
4. Peritonitis - The Eastern experience;Gupta S;World J Emerg Surg,2006
5. Risk-adjusted surgical audit with the POSSUM scoring system in a developing country;Yii MK;Br J Surg,2002