Does introducing outpatient pooling scheme reduce socioeconomic inequality in healthcare utilization? Evidence from a longitudinal study in China, 2011–2020

Author:

Zhang Tao1,Yu Meiteng1,Liu Jing2

Affiliation:

1. Hangzhou Normal University

2. Yuebei People's Hospital, Shantou University

Abstract

Abstract

Background In China, persistent health care inequalities coexist with universal health coverage due to limited financial protection for outpatient care. To address this issue, the Chinese Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance implemented an outpatient pooling scheme, aiming to alleviate cost-sharing burdens for outpatients. This study assesses the impact of this policy on socioeconomic disparities in outpatient care utilization. Methods Data from five waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011–2020) were utilized. Outcome variables included the possibility of outpatient visits, visits to hospitals and primary care facilities, as well as outpatient expenditures and out-of-pocket (OOP) payments. Propensity score matching formed a matched sample, and the concentration index (CI) for outcomes was calculated for policy-implementing and non-implementing groups. Decomposition of the CI and its changes were performed to identify the outpatient pooling's contribution to inequalities in outpatient care. Results The CI value for the likelihood of outpatient visits decreased from 0.1142 in 2011 to 0.0972 in 2020, with outpatient pooling contributing positively (4.14%) to this reduction. However, inequalities across different facility types increased over time. The CI for visits to hospitals changed from 0.0069 to 0.0431, and the CI for visits to primary care facilities changed from 0.0064 to -0.1091. The implementation of the policy counteracted these growing inequalities. Despite persistent pro-rich inequalities in outpatient expenditures and OOP payments, their CI values exhibited a substantial decline, and outpatient pooling played a pivotal role in steering the trend towards improving equity. Conclusion The introduction of the outpatient pooling scheme significantly contributes to diminishing pro-rich inequalities in outpatient care. However, socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of primary care and advanced services continue to widen despite the counteractive effects of policy implementation. Future interventions should adopt a comprehensive approach, extending beyond mere insurance benefits coverage, to address and rectify these persisting inequalities.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference48 articles.

1. Which UHC? Features for Equity and Universalism Comment on "Universal Health Coverage for Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Equity: Lessons From Australian Primary Healthcare";Loewenson R;International Journal of Health Policy and Management,2022

2. Lessons and prospects of Universal Health Coverage in China: the importance of equity, quality, and affordability;Li Z;Asian Bioethics Review,2019

3. Universal health insurance coverage for 1.3 billion people: What accounts for China's success?;Yu H;Health Policy,2015

4. Inequity in level of healthcare utilization before and after universal health coverage reforms in China: evidence from household surveys in Sichuan Province;Flato H;International Journal for Equity in Health,2016

5. General practice for the poor and specialist services for the rich: inequality evidence from a cross-sectional survey on Hangzhou residents, China;Zhang T;International Journal for Equity in Health,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3