The INTOXICATE study: Methodology, experience and preliminary results of a prospective cohort study

Author:

Zwaag Samanta M.1,Hengel-Koot Irma S. van den1,Baker Stuart2,Druwé Patrick3,Elhadi Muhammed4,Dufol Ana Ferrer5,Forsberg Sune6,Halacli Burcin7,Jung Christian8,Sakalauskienė Gabija Laubner9,Lindqvist Elin6,Moreno Rui10,Rabe Christian11,Reiter Nanna12,Rezar Richard13,Țincu Radu14,Topeli Arzu7,Wood David M.15,de Lange Dylan W.1,Hunault Claudine C.1

Affiliation:

1. Dutch Poisons Information Center (DPIC), University Medical Center Utrecht

2. Redcliffe Hospital

3. Ghent University Hospital

4. University of Tripoli

5. Clinic University Hospital

6. Karolinska Institute, Center for Resuscitation Science, Stockholm, Sweden

7. Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine

8. Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf

9. Toxicology Centre in Republic Vilnius University Hospital

10. Hospital de São José, Unidade Local de Saúde São José

11. Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich

12. Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiskberg

13. Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg

14. Bucharest Emergency Clinical Hospital, "Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy

15. Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, King’s Health Partners and King’s College London

Abstract

Abstract

Background No practice-based, multicenter database of poisoned patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) exists. The INTOXICATE study, endorsed by the ESICM and EAPCCT, aimed to collect detailed data on such patients. We hypothesized that the proportion of ICU intoxicated patients requiring genuine intensive care would be greater than previously reported. Methods Ethical approval was obtained for this multicenter, prospective study, and data-sharing contracts were signed. An electronic case report form was used to collect patient demographics, exposure, clinical features, investigations, treatment, and in-hospital mortality. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressors in the first 24 h after ICU admission, and/or who died in the hospital. A one-proportion z test was used to test the difference in outcome in this study compared with the proportion of 6.5% previously observed in a large study. Results Seventy-eight ICUs, mainly from Europe, but also from Australia and the Eastern Mediterranean, participated. The median time to sign a data sharing agreement between a unit and the coordinating center was 17 months. A total of 2,275 patients were enrolled between November 2020 and June 2023. The median patient age was 41 years, 72% of whom were exposed to human drugs; neurological symptoms were the most common clinical feature (83% of admissions), and the ICU mortality rate was 3.7%. The observed proportion of patients with the primary outcome (requiring ICU treatment) was 40% versus 6.5% as previously mentioned (p-value < 0.001). Conclusions This study collected high-quality detailed clinical data from a large cohort of acutely intoxicated ICU patients. The proportion of intoxicated patients admitted to the ICU and requiring ICU treatment was much greater than previously mentioned. The challenges identified during the study setup and data collection will enable modifications of these processes for future data collection studies. Trial registration OSF registration ID: osf.io/7e5uy

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference49 articles.

1. World Health Organization. Unintentional poisoning deaths: mortality rate from unintentional poisoning (per 100 000 population). 2024. https://data.who.int/indicators/i/84FD3DE. Accessed 5 May 2024.

2. World Health Organization. Suicide. 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide. Accessed 5 May 2024.

3. Fazel S, Runeson B. Suicide. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:266–74.

4. Worldwide suicide mortality trends (2000–2019): a joinpoint regression analysis;Ilic M;World J Psychiatry,2022

5. Divergence in recent trends in deaths from intentional and unintentional poisoning;Hempstead K;Health Aff (Millwood),2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3