The SMART approach to develop good cyber security metrics

Author:

Sherif Emad1,Yevseyeva Iryna1,Basto-Fernandes Vitor2,Cook Allan1

Affiliation:

1. De Montfort University

2. University Institute of Lisbon

Abstract

Abstract When it comes to the need to manage cyber security, identifying and utilising good cyber security metrics is essential. This allows organisations to manage their cyber risk more effectively. However, the literature lacks consensus on properties and characteristics of good metrics. We join the current efforts that aim at closing this gap. Hence, the main two objectives of this work are firstly to explore and identify relevant cyber security metrics proposed by researchers in the cyber security domain, and then to assess them against the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Relevant, and Timely) criteria to determine their feasibility and improve the quality of the selected security metrics. We identified 100 relevant metrics, of which 22 were able to be assessed against the SMART criteria. The resulting set of metrics can be considered as feasible set of metrics to implement. Additionally, we have identified the properties that a good metric should possess, most of which can be regarded as variants of the SMART criteria. Consequently, we extend the subcategories proposed by [1] to enhance the categorisation of metrics. The proposed subcategories are user, interface-induced, and software vulnerabilities; preventative, reactive, proactive defence strength; zero-day, targeted, botnet, malware, and evasion techniques; and security state, incidents, and investment. We propose to include the following: configuration management, access control management, backup and restore, security audit, security testing, and security training. Additionally, we recommend including two additional elements when assessing metrics wherein the metrics should be inexpensive to gather and independently verifiable via an outside reference.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference35 articles.

1. A survey on systems security metrics;Pendleton M;ACM Computing Surveys.,2016

2. Patrinos, H.: You Can’t Manage What You Don’t Measure. Available at https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/you-can-t-manage-what-you-don-t-measure (2014). Accessed 24 May 2023

3. Boyer, W., McQueen, M.: Ideal based cyber security technical metrics for control systems. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). pp. 246–260 (2008)

4. Abraham, S., Nair, S.: Exploitability analysis using predictive cybersecurity framework. In: Proceedings – 2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics, CYBCONF 2015. pp. 317–323 (2015)

5. Ahmed, Y., Naqvi, S., Josephs, M.: Cybersecurity Metrics for Enhanced Protection of Healthcare IT Systems. (2019)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3