I wasn't sure it would work. I was just trying: The choice of abortion methods among young women in Kilifi county, Kenya, and the Atlantique department, Benin

Author:

Omondi Gladys Akinyi1,Both Jonna2,Ouedraogo Ramatou1,Kimemia Grace1,Juma Kenneth1

Affiliation:

1. The African Population and Health Research Center

2. Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite the increased availability of safe abortion methods in sub-Saharan Africa, women continue to use unsafe abortion methods that result in severe complications, lifelong disabilities, and maternal deaths. Barriers to safe abortion methods are largely attributed to restrictive abortion laws, low levels of awareness of safe abortion methods, poverty, and socio-cultural and health system barriers. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of data on the pathways toward the use of either safe or unsafe abortion methods, and especially the mechanisms of decision-making around choices of abortion methods. By answering the questions: which abortion methods do women use and why? Who and what influences their decisions? What can we learn from their decision-making process to enhance the use of safe abortion methods? We provide an in-depth analysis of the rationale behind the choice of abortion methods used by women in Kilifi County in Kenya and the Atlantique department in Benin. Methods We derive data from an ethnographic study conducted between January and August 2021 on lived experiences, social determinants, and pathways to abortion. Data were collected using in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 95 girls and women who had a recent abortion experience. Key informant interviews (KIIs) and Focused group discussions (FGDs) were also conducted. Data analysis was carried out through an inductive process. Results Our findings reveal that women used a variety of methods to procure an abortion including the use of herbs, high doses of pharmaceutical drugs, homemade concoctions, medical abortion drugs, and surgical abortion methods. Women used the different methods singularly, multiple times, and sometimes mixed them to achieve their final goal of pregnancy termination. The primary motivation for the use of different abortion methods was the pursuit of social safety (preservation of social relationships and avoidance of shame and stigmatization) instead of medical safety. Conclusion Our findings affirm the need to increase access to reliable and well-framed information about safe abortion methods. Abortion services should also consider both medical and social safety.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference37 articles.

1. The Impact of Contraceptive Use and Abortion on Fertility in sub-Saharan Africa: Estimates for 2003–2014;Singh S;Popul Dev Rev,2017

2. Ganatra B, Gerdts C, Rossier C, Johnson BR, Tunçalp Ö, Assifi A, et al. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet (London, England) [Internet]. 2017 Nov 11 [cited 2022 Dec 9];390(10110):2372. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5711001/.

3. Government of Kenya (GoK). Constitution of Kenya 2010 [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 Aug 11]. Available from: http://kenyalaw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex/actview.xql?actid=Const2010.

4. Hussain R Abortion and Unintended Pregnancy in Kenya. Vol. 10, Nurse Prescribing. 2012.

5. Benin M. of health. Benin Health Statistical Yearbook 2016 | GHDx [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Dec 9]. Available from: https://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/benin-health-statistical-yearbook-2016.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3