Factors to Improve Odds of Success Following Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Machine Learning Analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background: Although high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an established treatment option for medial compartment osteoarthritis, the predictive factors for HTO treatment success remain unclear. This study aimed to identify informative variables associated with HTO treatment success and to develop and internally validate machine learning algorithms to provide patient-specific predictions of which patients will achieve HTO treatment success for medial compartmental osteoarthritis. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent medial opening-wedge HTO (MOWHTO) at our center between March 2010 and December 2015. The primary outcomes were the lack of conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and achievement of the minimal clinically important difference of improvement in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at a minimum of five years postoperatively. Recursive feature selection was used to identify the combination of variables from an initial pool of 25 features that optimized model performance. Five machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, multilayer perception, support vector machine, elastic-net penalized logistic regression, and random forest) were trained using five-fold cross-validation three times and applied to an independent test set of patients.The performance of the model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 231 patients were included, and 200 patients (86.6%) achieved treatment success at the mean of 9 years of follow-up. A combination of seven variables optimized algorithm performance, and specific cutoffs increased the likelihood of MOWHTO treatment success: body mass index (BMI) ≤26.8, preoperative KOOS for pain ≤46.0, preoperative KOOS for quality of life ≤33.0, preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score ≤42.0, preoperative Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) score >42.25, three-month postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle >1.0, and three-month postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) >91.5 and ≤94.7. The random forest model demonstrated the best performance (F1 score: 0.93; AUC: 0.81) and was transformed into an online application as an educational tool to demonstrate machine learning capabilities. Conclusions: The random forest machine learning algorithm best predicted MOWHTO treatment success. Patients with a lower BMI, poor clinical status, slight valgus overcorrection, and postoperative MPTA <94.7, more frequently achieved a greater likelihood of treatment success. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.