Assocations of Common Mental Disorder Severity With Treatment Contact and Treatment Intensity, and Its Changes Over Twelve Years

Author:

Nuyen Jasper1,Dorsselaer Saskia van1,Tuithof Marloes1,Luik Annemarie1,Kroon Hans1,Have Margreet ten1

Affiliation:

1. Trimbos Institute

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose. To guide formal healthcare resource allocation for common mental disorders (CMDs), this study updates and expands earlier findings on the associations of CMD severity with treatment contact and treatment intensity. Methods. Baseline data (2019–2022) of NEMESIS-3, a prospective study of a representative cohort of Dutch adults (18–75 years), were used. Severity of 12-month CMDs was assessed with the CIDI 3.0. Using multivariate analyses, its associations with 12-month treatment contact and treatment intensity for emotional/substance-use problems were examined, both for general medical care (GMC) only and mental health care (MHC). Changes over time were identified by making comparisons with baseline data (2007–2009) of NEMESIS-2. Results. Persons with severe CMDs were more likely to have made contact with GMC only or MHC compared to persons without CMDs. Between 2007–2009 and 2019–2022 the contact rate with GMC only increased stronger for moderate cases, while the increasing contact rate with MHC did not differ across CMD severity levels. Both among users of GMC only and MHC, severe cases had a higher likelihood of receiving treatment of the highest intensity level compared to persons without CMDs. Between 2007–2009 and 2019–2022 the rate of highest treatment intensity increased stronger for severe cases using GMC only, while a trend towards a stronger decrease in this rate was found for severe cases using MHC. Conclusion. Evidence was found that treatment of CMDs in GMC has been strengthened in the past twelve years. No indications were found that allocation of MHC resources to severe cases has improved. Word count abstract: 250

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3