Affiliation:
1. Institute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, University Medical Center, University of Geneva
2. Direction of Care, University Hospitals of Geneva
3. Institute of Family and Child Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We developed Accordons-nous, a smartphone app to support patients in the advance care planning (ACP) process. The app raises awareness and facilitates communication on this sensitive topic. It helps patients to express their values and preferences for care, and to write their advance directives (AD).
Objective
Measure the impact of distributing Accordons-nous, compared to the distribution of a leaflet, on common patients’ propensity to engage in an ACP process. Secondary objectives are to test the effect of socio-demographic factors (age, health state, gender, study level) on the propensity to engage in ACP.
Methods
Pre-post randomized control study. Participants were common patients approached in medical waiting rooms. They received the app (treatment) or an information leaflet (control) and responded to two questionnaires: one at recruitment and a second 2–4 weeks later. We measured improvement on four variables relevant to ACP: reported Contemplation of an event relevant to ACP, Decision about treatment in case of that event, Discussion about it with relatives or health care professionals, and Writing advance directives. Statistical analysis included between groups comparisons of pre-post differences with 2-sample tests for equality of proportions and logistic regression models.
Results
We recruited 473 participants and obtained full responses from 312. Overall the intervention (control and treatment together) affected positively the mean reported ACP engagement on all variables: new or renewed Contemplation 54%; increase in Decision + 8%, Discussion + 11%, and Writing + 1%, compared to the baseline. Compared to the control (leaflet), the treatment group (app) had a larger effect size on all variables: between groups difference in Contemplation + 11% (logistic regression, p = .05), Decision + 1% (but p = .94 on this variable), Discussion + 5% (p = .05), and Writing AD + 5% (p = 0.03). Moreover, increase in age is positively correlated with having written AD at inclusion (21% among retired compared to 2% among young adults) and with the propensity to write AD after our intervention (logistic regression, p = .001). Other factors tested (frequency of consultations, gender, level of education) had no effect on participants’ ACP engagement.
Conclusions
When distributed without specific counselling, our tool is efficient to increase reported ACP engagement although the effect sizes remain modest. Further studies are needed to investigate whether the app could profit more to ACP engagement when it is used by professionals in dedicated ACP consultations.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. McMahan RD, Tellez I, Sudore RL. Deconstructing the complexities of advance care planning outcomes: what do we know and where do we go? A scoping review.J Am Geriatr Soc 2021 Jan07;69(1):234–244. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16801
2. Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Advance care planning, particularly in the event of incapacity to consent. General framework for Switzerland (in French). URL: https://www.plateforme-soinspalliatifs.ch/sites/default/files/work/files/Rahmenkonzept_Gesundheitl_Vorausplanung_FR_rev.pdf [accessed 2022-09-24]
3. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care;Rietjens JA;Lancet Oncol
4. Bosisio F, Jox RJ, Jones L, Rubli Truchard E. Planning ahead with dementia: what role can advance care planning play? A review on opportunities and challenges.Swiss Med Wkly 2018 Dec17;148:w14706. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2018.14706.
5. Vilpert S, Borrat-Besson C, Maurer J, Borasio GD. Awareness, approval and completion of advance directives in older adults in Switzerland.Swiss Med Wkly 2018 Jul16;148:w14642. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2018.14642