Abstract
Background
Performance status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important parameters in the management of metastatic prostate cancer. The clinician-preferred Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) may not relate with the patient-described HRQoL because the later puts into consideration some aspects of health that are not captured by the former. The aim of this study is to define the relationship between clinician-preferred ECOG-PS and the patient-determined HRQoL in men with metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (mPCa).
Methods
An analytical cross-sectional study recruiting patients presenting with mPCa in Enugu, southeast Nigeria. Two clinicians agreed on an ECOG-PS score for each study participant who in turn completed the FACT-P and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaires with interviewer-assistance where necessary. Other medical information was retrieved from the records. ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to compare available data across ECOG-PS preferences and ordinal logistic regression was used to determine the FACT-P questionnaire items that related significantly with the ECOG-PS preferences.
Results
Of the 224 participants (mean age: 70.62 ± 7.34), about 60.7% had ≥ 12years of formal education and 84.9% had ISUP grade ≥ 3 cancer. In all, 22.8%, 55.8%, 21.0% and 0.4% were ECOG-PS 1, ECOG-PS 2, ECOG-PS 3 and ECOG-PS 4 respectively while the mean FACT-P score, EQ-HVI and EQ-VAS score were 80.18 ± 17.56, 0.524 ± 0.324 and 60.43 ± 9.91% respectively. The FACT-P score (p = 0.002), EQ-HVI (p < 0.001) and EQ-VAS score (p < 0.001) varied significantly across the ECOG-PS categories. Within the FACT-P, only questionnaire items GP3 (p = 0.024) and GP7 (p < 0.001) of the PWB domain, and items GF5 (p = 0.009) and GF6 (p = 0.003) of the FWB domain related strongly with the ECOG-PS categories.
Conclusion
There are indications that HRQoL questionnaire items that have to do with impairment in physical role functioning relate strongly with ECOG-PS categories.