Identifying heterogeneous subgroups of systemic autoimmune diseases by applying a joint dimension reduction and clustering approach to immunomarkers
Author:
Chang Chia-Wei1, Wang Hsin-Yao2, Lin Wan-Ying3, Wang Yu-Chiang4, Lo Wei-Lin5, Lin Ting-Wei2, Yu Jia-Ruei2, Tseng Yi-Ju1
Affiliation:
1. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University 2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou 3. Syu Kang Sport Clinic 4. Brigham and Women’s Hospital 5. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The high complexity of systemic autoimmune diseases (SADs) has hindered precise management. This study aims to investigate heterogeneity in SADs.
Methods
We applied a joint cluster analysis, which jointed multiple correspondence analysis and k-means, to immunomarkers and measured the heterogeneity of clusters by examining differences in immunomarkers and clinical manifestations. The electronic health records of patients who received an antinuclear antibody test and were diagnosed with SADs, namely systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and Sjögren’s syndrome (SS), were retrieved between 2001 and 2016 from hospitals in Taiwan.
Results
With distinctive patterns of immunomarkers, a total of 11,923 patients with the three SADs were grouped into six clusters. None of the clusters was composed only of a single SADs, and these clusters demonstrated considerable differences in clinical manifestation. Both patients with SLE and SS had a more dispersed distribution in the six clusters. Among patients with SLE, the occurrence of renal compromise was higher in Clusters 3 and 6 (52% and 51%; p < 0.001) than in the other clusters. Cluster 3 also had a high proportion of patients with discoid lupus (60%; p < 0.001) than did Cluster 6 (39%). Patients with SS in Cluster 3 were the most distinctive because of the high occurrence of immunity disorders (63%) and other and unspecified benign neoplasm (58%) with statistical significance compared with the other clusters (all p values < 0.05).
Conclusions
The immunomarker-driven clustering method could recognise more clinically relevant subgroups of the SADsand would provide a more precise diagnosis basis.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus;Cojocaru M;Maedica,2011 2. Long-term outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus: trends over time and major contributors;Arnaud L;Rheumatology,2020 3. Undifferentiated connective tissue diseases (UCTD): Simplified systemic autoimmune diseases;Mosca M;Autoimmun Rev,2011 4. A.D.A.P P, Committee. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022, Diabetes Care. 45 (2022) S17–S38. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-s002. 5. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, Chairpersons AFM, Subcommittee B, Katus HA, Apple FS, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Subcommittee E, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Subcommittee I, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Subcommittee C, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Subcommittee I, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand J-P, Menasché P, Ravkilde J, T.&, Subcommittee R, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Subcommittee HF, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Subcommittee E, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Subcommittee GP, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon J-L, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S, CPG) EC, Baumgartner H, Ceconi C, Dean V, Deaton C, Fagard R, Funck-Brentano C, Hasdai D, Hoes A, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, McDonagh T, Moulin C, Popescu BA, Reiner Ž, Sechtem U, Sirnes PA, Torbicki A, Vahanian A, Windecker S, Reviewers D, Morais J, Aguiar C, Almahmeed W, Arnar DO, Barili F, Bloch KD, Bolger AF, Bøtker HE, Bozkurt B, Bugiardini R, Cannon C, de Lemos J, Eberli FR, Escobar E, Hlatky M, James S, Kern KB, Moliterno DJ, Mueller C, Neskovic AN, Pieske BM, Schulman SP, Storey RF. K.A. Taubert, P. Vranckx, D.R. Wagner, Third universal definition of myocardial infarction, in: Eur Heart J, 2012: pp. 2551–2567. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184.
|
|